Friday, February 8, 2008

Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Stepney, London E1 area, UK, campaign against Big Business Crossrail hole plot against the East End

external Web pages may not be accessed from this site


The 6th Edition of the day of the AADHIKARonline London UK was updated at 1220 Hrs GMT on Friday 8 February 2008


Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Stepney, London E1 area, UK, campaign against Big Business Crossrail hole plot [as contained in the current ‘Crossrail Bill’ in the UK ‘House of Lords’ the ‘Upper Chamber’ of the UK Parliament] against the East End of London.

East London Against Crossrail hole plotter Ken Livingstone as mayor of London [More details shortly]
_. Related external web sites and blog publishers to AADHIKARonline include
_.
_. www.aadhikar.com
_. www.cbruk.com
_. www.khoodeelaar.com
_. www.khoodeelaar.wordpress.com


__http://povertyofgordonbrownandhisvahloos.blogspot.com_

_CLICK HERE for the LATEST KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot campaign action news and info. Also to view the latest KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law and evidential documents and materials. These are being published as part of the formal KHOODEELAAR! objections presented to the UK House of Lords ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘SELECT COMMITTEE’. __In case you cannot get access by hypertext from here, log on to khoodeelaar.wordpress.com for the texts in full of the key objections against the ‘Crossrail Bill’ by Khoodeelaar! and the Khoodeelaar! Constitutional law commentary against the present CrossRail Bill [currently in the UK Parliamentary House of Lords] The Khoodeelaar! objections have been submitted on Wednesday [30 January 2008] and will be followed by updates and contextual reports on this and related web sites carrying materials from the considered campaign against the Crossrail hole plot…. also on this web site we shall be posting KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN information and commentary regarding the overall social, economic, environmental, cultural, historic, political, legal and constitutional settings, backgrounds and evidence as part of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign in defence of the East End of London community against the Big Business Crossrail hole plot..
All materials as published by AADHIKAR MEDIA FOUNDATION here [except those that we occasionally refer to and quote from external sources - the sources are clearly identified and their authorship/s is/are acknowledged] are originally conceived, researched, written and Edited. The fact that they are published for 'free' access via the internet must not be confused with their being legally and ethical and moray unprotected. The materials are NOT to be reprinted or re-published in any form except [and only] with the full legal and IPR statements as published by the AADHIKAR Media Foundation and the Editor being also included in full._For legal, intellectual property rights permission and licence and details, send your request in full initially in an e-mail to_aadhikarlaw@yahoo.co.uk__This should be done before any assumption of consent, permission or agreement

The 6th Edition of the day of the AADHIKARonline London UK was updated at 1220 Hrs GMT on Friday 8 February 2008

This web site is being brought to you by AADHIKAR Media Foundation supporting Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Stepney, London E1 area, UK, campaign against the Big Business-dictated Crossrail hole plot [as contained in the current ‘Crossrail Bill’ in the UK ‘House of Lords’ the ‘upper chamber’ of the UK Parliament] against the East End of London. __[More info later]


1210 HRS GMT LONDON FRIDAY 8 FEBRUARY 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! NO TO 'CROSSRAIL BILL'


- Updating the evidence, the context and the background to the formal objections by KHOODEELAAR! against the 'Crossrail Bill' [in the UK House of Lords] as put to the UK 'HOUSE OF LORDS' on 30 January 2008:


One of the key objections is that the way that the London CrossRail hole scheme has been promoted, the propaganda for CrossRail, has been based on a series of lies by its fronter, the peddler in chief ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone


_KHOODEELAAR! NO TO 'CROSSRAIL BILL' -



updating the evidence, the context and the background to the formal objections by KHOODEELAAR! as put to the UK 'HOUSE OF LORDS' on 30 January 2008: One of the key objections is that the way that the London CrossRail schema has been promoted, the propaganda for CrossRail, has been based on a series of lies. _Those lies lie at the centre of the crassly conceived CROSSRAIL scheme. Not only have the lies been conceived of and perpetrated by callously, irresponsibly and unconstitutionally deciding to enable significant sums [like £Billions] of public money to become available for exploitation and pocketing by BIG BUSINESS conglomerates operating in 'major construction and related fields. _But the lies have been adopted also as slogans that been foisted on the forums and via the media to replace hard facts and verifiable, objective and independent evidence. _This strategy of lying and lies runs through the entire CrossRail programme. …. one of the most serious has been Livingstone’s racistly contrived attack on the Scots for ‘taking money away from London…’. _This anti-Scots, Ken Livingstone-lie has been part of the propaganda packaged in the peddling for the ‘London CrossRail’. Livingstone has been aided and abetted in this giant fabrication by the city of London and their chief fabricator Michael Snyder. Others who have perpetrated aspects of that Livingstone lie have included the so-called railway expert ‘journalist’ [and available for hire] Christian Wolmer and the corrupt ‘academic’ [!!!!] Tony Travers doing his side business from the address provided at the London school of economics. Despite being authoritatively told almost 20 years ago that Travers was a proven faker, the BBC keeps routinely giving Travers broadcast spots to appear as if he knows what he talks about in relation to London or that he has any integrity whatever. _In the anti-Scots/Scottish propaganda, allegedly justified by Livingstone, Snyder et al by their assertion that ‘the London money that was being given to Scotland should be spent in London’ they then went on to cite CrossRail _As the ‘perfect thing that would solve all the problems’ that London faced… _They flaunted Crossrail as a mantra. Fanatically, callously. Unconstitutionally. _[To be continued] ___Earlier on Friday 8 February 2008: _Livingstone is lying. _Still! _That is why I gave him the description Lyingstill Livingstone. _He lied again on Thursday 7 February 2008. _And he was not challenged by any of the ‘reporters’ or ‘editorial writers’ that were in the vicinity of the platform where Livingstone sat making those untruthful, and lying claims! _His lying is getting even more desperate than had been the case before. _He has got used to lying on the assumption that no matter how brazen, he will get away with it. He has tricks that other people don’t have. That is what he ‘thinks’. _It is quite possible that events will prove Ken Livingstone to have been additionally hampered by a propensity to perennial fantasy. _Fantasising that he is a world statesman of a kind that in reality does not exist may yet be his final undoing. As far as his career at the expense of the public is concerned that is. _Even if some credible traces could be found [on a theoretical bias] of there having been a world statesman somewhere remotely resembling that which Livingstone has pretended himself to be, the image would not stand the test of the millions of questions that must be immediately answered by any such ‘personality’ as proof hat they were real and were morally sustainable. _Ken Livingstone could not even answer the first question. _That question would be: _Have you ever in the 40 years of your career at the expense of the people in London come across a single person, of the types that must of your personalised current entourage are, who would ‘risk their all to back you’ without their having been either aware of or influenced by a major publicly paid for office held by you that did not bring with it the 'institutionalised power' to make grants or the permission for your being able to make money-related and grant-making decisions, de facto, ones that can be compared with the grants [and the accompanying ‘preferments’] that you have been making from the ‘mayor of London’s establishment’ or from the former greater London council’? _Livingstone has been a corrupting influence in London. _The answer to the corruption that he has been associated with causing in London public life is not just to oust him from public office. The answer is to truthfully and urgently look at the mountains of degeneration that Ken Livingstone has been responsible for causing in the inner city parts of London and then to actively oppose any other holder of similar public office behaving in the corrupting way as well. [To be continued]


The MUHAMMAD HAQUE commentary on Boris Johnson and the stupidity of pretending to oppose something that Johnson has on the evidence so far got no idea about – the ‘deeds and the misdeeds of the incumbent in the office that Johnson allegedly seeks to occupy on 2 May 2008 [the day after the scheduled 1 May 2008 'elections' for the mayor of London and the ‘GLA’[=] ‘Greater London Assembly']’
By©Muhammad Haque_0530 Hrs GMT London Thursday 7 February 2008_If Boris Johnson, currently [or 'still'] the official 'candidate' for the David Ca-Moron Conservative Party for the post of 'mayor of London’ is in fact [!!!] clever, and clued up and competent, as his apologists and assorted promoters claim him to be then the 'attributes' are staying very deceptively hidden. Boris is NOT coming across as being even moderately competent. Or worse, aware of what the political task in London is about.___It is bad enough having to suffer the corruption of London that has been 'achieved' by Ken Livingstone. Is 'Boris Johnson' the 'answer' to the incumbent? _Not on the evidence on display so far. Boris most certainly is clueless. And this word, 'clueless' is not one of my preferred indicators of the appropriateness or otherwise of Boris Johnson… . I am using it here in relation to Johnson to echo a representative sample of most accessible commentators observers that so far have expressed shock, disappointment and frustration in various measures about the alleged candidature of Boris Johnson for the post of mayor of London…__[To be continued]


_. KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for a democratic, accountable, transparent and relevant ‘elected’ ‘body’ for the people of London- the updater context - How could Crassrail contrive to cause clueless Boris Johnson sink into the Crassrail hole of his own making?!!!
_.
_.
_.
_.
_.
_.
due here and on the associated web sites backing the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail hole plot In London ['the Crossrail hole Bill'] [now In the UK Houses of Parliament as the 'Crossrail Bill'] during Thursday 7 February 2008





MUHAMMAD HAQUE ethical commentary on the poverty of Gordon Brown’s preaching ‘British vah-loos’ when the country has several million people in abject poverty and indignity

2225 HRS GMT London 4 February 2008: KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! TO THE ‘CROSSRAIL-BANNED LONDON CYCLISTS’ - ____KHOODEELAAR! NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE PLOT [THE ‘CROSSRAIL BILL’ NOW IN THE UK PARLIAMENT _– ‘HOUSE OF LORDS’] CAMPAIGN: __in the context of the reality of Gordon Brown’s shutting his eyes to x truth about poverty and injustice being caused to millions of ‘British’ people! Gordon Brown’s ‘endorsement’ –_however allegedly reluctantly – of and statement of commitment of £billions of public money to the London CRASSRail scam flaunted for big business by Ken Livingstone, shows that Brown does not possess the ethical credibility to claim that he has a moral position that can be distinguished from Tony Blair’s…given that the current ‘CROSSRAIL BILL’ [as at Monday 4 February 2008] is so flawed, given that the main flaws are to be found in the messy, irrational and uneconomic contents of the plan; _also the fact that Gordon Brown chose to ignore the key findings of the Eddington report [into the ‘FUTURE OF RAILWAY’ TRANSPORT IN THE UK – a report which Brown himself had commissioned whilst still the uk finance minister] – Eddington advised Brown AGAINST backing Crossrail [as reported by Channel 4 News, more on this source in a later report]. ___KHOODEELAAR! is telling Gordon Brown to scrap Crossrail and show that he really des have the intelligence and the wisdom to drop what is crass and go for a reasonable, realistic and a sustainable solution to the transport needs that people of London face. __If Brown refuses to pay heed to this and stubbornly defies rationality then it will be his fault and he will have to take the blame when CRASSrail and the crasser consequences of it unraveling around - or behind [if it happens o be the case that he has to flee the powerful post at No 10 Downing street head of schedule -] Brown.

_______
MUHAMMAD HAQUE, the organiser of Khoodeelaar! The Campaign against Crossrail hole plot’, posted at 1025 Hrs GMT this morning [Thursday 31 January 2008] the following comment in response to a report carried by the Wimbledon Guardian


__Your item “New business is unusual in Sutton” by Lisa Williams” contains too many false comparisons. The assumptions underlying those are equally unfounded. __What you have stated will be included in the list of inaccuracies and wrong references to 'East London' that we shall be citing in the actual detailed evidence that we are preparing to present to Parliament [at the meeting/s of the UK ‘House of Lords’] ‘CROSSRAIL BILL’ ‘SELECT COMMITTEE’ to be held in probably a matter of weeks __What is supposed to be meant by “the next Canary Wharf “ ? __The PRESENT Canary Wharf is NOT about “East London”. __It never has been. __No ‘Canary Wharf’ will ever be. __You quote Chris Wood of the Sutton Chamber of Commerce as referring to “East London” as if it did not include Barking and Dagenham [mentioned in the second paragraph where you report the release of some figures by MP Paul Burstow]. __Canary Wharf was imposed on and is physically on land that is in ‘East London’ but with plans that came from a very far away place. The distance between the ordinary people and community in the parts of the East London borough of Tower Hamlets that had been populated before Canary Wharf was imposed and the commuter-culture ‘thousands’ who figure in the ‘work force’ that maintains the imposed extension cannot be adequately described in one sentence. __The difference represents several centuries of intra-societal discrimination and exploitation. __Those are being continued today with the apparently political signboards being exhibited on the geographical ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council. __As soon as the immediate surroundings could be treated as sufficiently altered to a state where the ordinary East End people could in effect be pushed further into the social exclusion zones and categories then we have begun to see the appearance, for the first time ever in this part of ‘East London’, of the "appropriate" political representation from the Canary Wharf ‘ward’ [!] on Tower Hamlets Council. __Just so that there is no room for assuming that ‘Canary Wharf’ ‘Politics’ is in any way ‘East Loudon people’s democratic or social representation politics’, the personnel manning and womanning the fronting of the ‘Canary Wharf’ political agenda have ALL been drafted in from the suitably Canary Wharf –ite Schools, stables and ideological shires in other places, not ideologically so different from the Sutton that you have in the background of the thoughts applied in your report! __These fronter are equally silent about the serious flaws in and of the Crossrail scheme. Just as they are silent on the fact that the 2012 Olympic Games hosting diversion is not going to make any qualitative improvements to the economic or the social entitlements or rights of the ordinary people across ‘East London’. __The above summarised statement represents the condition that has existed across East London where STUNTS are being staged by the likes of the current occupant in the post of the mayor of London and their co-careerists and time-servers who have been fabricating a scenario in the name of the ‘East London’ people by projecting the ‘2012 Games’ and Crossrail on to the propaganda platforms suggesting that the two things mean the people in the area will ‘benefit’. __This propaganda has been a gigantic and multi-faceted lie. __This is why for the past four years Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area Campaign against the CrossRail hole Bill [the hybrid ‘Crossrail Bill’ now in the UK Parliament – the ‘House of Lords’] has been campaigning to put the facts on the record as we as to stop the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London.


[The KHOODEELAAR! Objections to the ‘Crossrail Bill’, will be detailed in the next parts of these reports and commentaries]
Thousands of local people from across the East End of London areas affected by the Crossrail hole plot [the Crossrail Bill’ now in the UK Parliament, the ‘House of Lords’] are supporting the formal putting of the objections by the campaigning organization Khoodeelaar! to the ‘House of Lords’ against the “Crossrail Bill”


More on this and on related web sites shortly

_Muhammad Haque commentary: NO to Rail PR by EXCel London

_By©Muhammad Haque Organiser_Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole plot scam [the ‘Crossrail Bill’ now in the UK Parliament - the ‘House of Lords’] _2235 Hrs GMT_London Tuesday 29 January 2008


First comments on and response by KHOODEELAAR! NO to Crossrail hole Plot CAMPAIGN organiser Muhammad Haque to the London UK Times online promotion today Tuesday 29 January 2008 of ‘Vanessa Cotton, the managing director of events at ExCeL London’ which is situated not far from Canary Wharf in the East End of London – on a socially and economically opposite site and position to Whitechapel, Brick Lane and Stepney….


You [the London Times-online] quote Vanessa Cotton, the managing director of events at ExCeL London as saying “… when Crossrail is built, we’ll have our own station.” You don’t quote her on any aspect of the poverty, lack of education, lack of qualification, lack of jobs, lack of adequate housing or income that predominate the lives of tens of thousands in the ’same’ ‘East End’ of London. You could not quote her on any of those even if you wanted to. She would first have to have something truthful, credible, real and journalistically and topically quotable to say on those. To do so would expose her and those setting the agenda for the propaganda blitz around and for Crossrail and the 2012 hosting of the Olympic Games as the fabricators that they are. __The ‘East End of London’ is NOT going to benefit from Crossrail. Just as the hosting of the 2012 Olympic Games is not going to make any justifiable difference for the better to the lives and to the prospects of the communities across the affected parts of the East End of London. __Ordinary people who are part of the ordinary population. The benefits will go to Big Business and the categories of their colluders who are propelling the fraudulent scheme designed to enable construction conglomerates to relieve the UK public of between 20 Billion and 40 Billion pound sterling [at January 2008 prices] under a wide variety of falsehoods, inventions and untruths. __The Crossrail benefits are designed to go to the well-off and the outsiders. To the Big Business and their touts and their agents and their peddlers. __The tell tale signs are all transparent in their conduct so far. Not in their words as they would like to utter them. But in their actions. Those actions speak louder than their concealed words of hypocrisy and double lies. __The reason why the Crossrail hole plot-backers wanted to have a ‘Crossrail station’ at Whitechapel AT ALL is demonstrably a fake one. It is NOTHING to do with the people of the area. It is to use Whitechapel to reach Canary Wharf. It is ALSO to use the space and the land in this part of the East End so that some Big Business-linked property owners and speculators do not have to give up on their own prize spots of speculative East London land. __And it is to use that as a ‘benefit’ in the name of the collective ‘East End of London’ in the touting, stooging role of the Crossrail hole-plot-inviter clique on the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council. __A little to the north west of Vanessa’s ‘ ExCeL London ‘ location, life is existed on different paces. And de facto little expectations. Historically and politically, this is how the forces pushing for Crossrail scam [‘scheme’] want it. This is how the Blair regime wanted it. This is how Gordon Brown is set to continue to want it.. Last but not least, this is how the ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone wants it. __All of these power-wielding elements and agents behaving in adverse ways against the interest of the people of the Eats End of London want to use the people and the land in the East End of London to make gains by depriving the people. __By covering up the structural, the social, the institutional, the organisational denials, deprivations that have been perpetrated and perpetuated in the name of the people against whom these injustices have been operated and are being continued, the plotters, the agencies and the forces pushing for the Crassly conceived Crossrail London scam are laying the foundations for far deeper, far wider social injustice and inequality than can be detected if their propaganda words alone are taken to be their statements of intent or their purpose behind the pernicious plan. __[To be continued] _

Muhammad Haque daily commentary on the dire need for competence by those who are guaranteed payments and are paid handsomely in public bodies like the local tower hamlets council in the East End of London__just how incompetent is the local tower hamlets council? how much public money is misused, abused and wasted because of the incompetence of the personnel in place in that council? [To be continued]

The Muhammad Haque daily world ethical commentary from Gordon Brown’s Britain _2255 Hrs GMT _London Sunday 27 January 2008

Channel 4 News ‘Political Awards’, broadcast today [1900 Hrs GMT Sunday 27 January 2008] by the UK TV station Channel 4

It praises a troupe of Ken Livingstone Ethnicity Linked paraders in that broadcast. This broadcast today coincides with the appearance on the internet sites belonging to UK main stream news outlets and publishers and in the associated ‘mainstream British newspapers’ of probably the largest number of derogatory articles EVER pub shed about the ‘Undone mayor” Ken Livingstone himself in one single day.. _The contrast is historic. It is far more important than any sporadic item of accidental 'news' that might have been carried in any of the weekday bulletins fronted by Jon SLOW Snow himself. SLOW is one of the corrupt state’s genial-faced perpetrators of pernicious lies. SLOW tells lies in a digested way. So most of the zombified audience. So what on earth was this ‘Operation Black Vote’ ? Typically uninformative beneath a facade of convoluted stage effects and scenes designed to give the additional subliminal messages to the candidates for consolidated brainwashing, Jon SLOW contrived to convey clarity. He feigned affinity with anther manageable display of tokenized yoofs from downtrodden Hackney. And then they had the two-member ensemble from Wales. It had to be from Wales. The its bitsy fabrication was not concealed as a semi-political staged stunt. It was outrageously calmly exhibited in a wanton show of defiance to taste and con sense as a brazen insult of the worst kind. It was lower than the low. And Jon Slow was more shameless than any of the dodgy, shift, untrustworthy, evasive 'news' characters that have featured in any of the editions fronted by him of the Channel 4 News in the allegedly august period of the relevant past ten years… And then they had another politically dead and ethically empty and morality-free body parked in the assemblage of invitees and awardees upon whose features the Channel Four Political Award camera crew kept on focussing at every available excuse…[To be continued]

__From©Muhammad Haque_To _Editor in Chief online.editor@timesonline.co.uk_
Is it too much to ask Gordon Brown to practise compliance with the rules of constitutionality? _Or is Gordon Brown afraid that constitutionality will expose the shallowness, the waste and the unsustainability contained in the unwanted and the damaging schemes he appears intent on pushing through the unaccountably whipped Houses of the UK parliament? _The seriously flawed Department for Transport [DfT] is the only UK central Govt department that fell foul of its comprehensive constitutional obligations in a very big way more than 20 years ago. _Two decades on, the DfT seems to be being run by the same types of wrong headed, unconstitutional interests that had displayed Govt disregard for constitutional standards that the same Govt otherwise preaches and flaunts. _The DfT has been misleading the public and abusing executive influence over a cowed parliament [that is permanently whipped to let big business agenda through without practically any scrutiny] to push thorough a most empty scheme like Crossrail. Those of us opposing the seriously flawed 'Crossrail Bill' [now in the uk house of lords, the upper chamber] have been asking the DfT for the past four years to behave constitutionally. We have found that the Govt is not interested in actually observing its constitutional obligations on transport. _This is why we are preparing to mount legal challenges to the DfT [=UK Govt] as soon as the pro-Crossrail Bill-whipped formalities are over in the UK House of lords about the 'Crossrail Bill'. _Khoodeelaar! No to ‘Crossrail hole Bill’ CAMPAIGN _0100 Hrs _London _Sunday 27 January 2008

By©Muhammad Haque
2050 Hrs GMT London Saturday 26 January 2008

Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole plot [the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as it is currently in the UK ‘House of Lords’ – the ‘upper chamber’ in the UK parliament] CAMPAIGN Manifesto for London 2008 – the next parts due here during this weekend.
_By©Muhammad Haque
1440 Hrs GMT London Thursday 24 January 2008:

After Peter Hain’s resignation, it is not tenable for Gordon Brown to say that his administration is made of only truth-tellers … get Ruth Kelly to tell the truth about the CrossRail hole plot

coming here shortly

KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole Bill' [the 'Crossrail Bill’ as is in the UK ‘House of Lords’ now] CAMPAIGN - advising Gordon Brown in the hour after Peter Hain's resignation news breaks, that he, Brown should scrap the CRASSrail hole plot Bill in its present form...

Khoodeelaar! defending the community in the East End of London, situated in the ‘London Borough of Tower Hamlets’ which is described by independently active students of in income disparity [=inequality] , social exclusion and discrimination and deprivation in the UK today, as being either one of the or the most deprived inner city area in all of England .. Khoodeelaar! Says to Gordon Brown that he should scrap the attacks on the East End of London and on other counties across London that are still contained in the seriously flawed and wasteful ‘CrossRail Bill’ scheme– in the wake of the announcement in the past hour [time calculated at 1410 Hrs GMT 24 January 2008] of the much-anticipated resignation by Peter Hain from Gordon Brown’s cabinet, Khoodeelaar! Says to Gordon Brown – STOP being arrogant in showing your backing for Crossrail hole plot-backer Ken Livingstone.. Start telling the truth about the really pernicious elements that have pushed you into the corner where you had to make the bold but evidentially and objectively unjustifiable utterances fir the CRASSrail project. Listen to the people and you will stay in office… If you dismiss the people who are telling the truth and if you continue to go down the road of hypocrisy, spin and contradictions and if you get addicted to preferring to listen to those who bid you to rely on the courtiers and sycophants like Steve STUPID Richards of the ‘Independent’ then you will find that you are lacking in essential legitimacy to remain in office… This is not a threat, Gordon.. This is a warning that all truthful observers of your time so far in office at 'Number 10 Downing Street' will want you to pay attention to …Khoodeelaar!…continuing to show up the unconstitutionality of conduct by the UK Govt that is being used as a tool for Big Business to loot the UK public under the misleading covers of the London CrossRail hole project….

[To be continued]


CROSSRAIL hole-plotter “undone mayor” Ken Livingstone has been defended [!!!] by Darcus Howe. As he has been by the weekly Vice [Oops! ‘Voice’ ‘newspaper’]. _Darcus Howe is also confessing to treating with equal respectfulness the one-time ‘Labour Party Black Section’ –banner-flaunting self-seekers Keith Vaz and Diane Abbott [1983-87] [1987 was the ‘general election’ which let those two into the CORRUPTING House of Commons as ‘Labour Party ETHNIC MPs’ along with the late Bernie Grant and the unlamented Paul Boateng]._There is no evidence that ANY SINGLE ONE of the ethnicity-linked time servers in either the House of Commons or in the even more corruptly appointed and installed 'House of Lords' has justified any hype attaching to their ‘appointments’ – none of them has shown any consistent or memorable or mentionable parliamentary democratic or ethical integrity let alone independence of mind or thought in any field and in any debate or on any issue that really matters in the context of the so-called black or ethnic representation in the UK parliament_I say 'so-called'!_Why? I shall give the criteria and description and justification for saying that. Before I do that, questions must be asked. The first questions include these:__What does Darcus Howe know that those who have apparently questioned Ken LYINGSTILL Livingstone’s integrity don’t know? What does Darcus Howe have as demonstrable evidence of his ‘career’ that is made up of ‘giving up personal gains for the sake of the collective society’? Has Darcus Howe EVER published the facts of any such? OTHER than the hypes that he fomented at the expense of un-named black people who really made the main sacrifices at both the Notting Hill battles and at Lewisham?_Has Darcus Howe been given the platform on the NewSS [=’New Statesman and `Society’ – now reverted back to ‘New Statesman’] because of the 'integrity' of Howe's 'character' and 'actions' before he was able to qualify for the Lyinsgtill's ‘Freedom Pass’ that he [Howe] has been exhibiting in ‘substantiation’ of his overly pretentious presumption that his statement [carried, ironically in the NEW SS website and publication - the same one that has Martin Bright as its 'political editor'] of support for Ken Livingstone amounts to something so significant that no other member of the ‘black’ population in the UK can universally verifiably claim to lend to THEIR opinion or views on the matter?


[To be continued]

1035 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 23 January 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole Bill' [the 'Crossrail Bill’ as is in the UK ‘House of Lords’ now] CAMPAIGN - continuing to update the UK House of Lords [as the legislative ‘upper chamber’ of the UK parliament, now preparing to formally ‘consider’ the ‘CrossRail Bill’] on the record and the evidence showing the unconstitutionality of conduct by the main touts for Big Business CRASSRAIL scam..._We add to the already existent massive files on Ken Livingstone’s lying perpetrations for the CRASSrail hole scam. This analysis of Ken Livingstone’s irresponsible and careeristic fiction [below] one is taken from the website today [Wednesday 23 January 2008] of a money magazine that exposes Livingstone’s subsidiary lying project - Livingstone’s peddling of the London Olympics 2012 myths and hypes.

The magazine publishes the analysis from another source, named in the contents below, that exposes the immorality and the inaccuracy of Ken Livingstone's maths….. _His maths too are a myth… __" Ken's Olympic-sized miscalculation _23.01.2008 _Here is a little mathematical conundrum for you. What number, if compounded at 6% per year, becomes 800m… but if compounded at 16% per year becomes worth 1.8bn? And how many years would this take? And if multiplied by 20% per year, would this number be 3bn? ___These are some of the questions posed by recent revelations that, in order to pay for the Olympic Games, money will be ‘borrowed’ from the National Lottery Fund; to be repaid from land sales once the great sporting jamboree is over. Sorting through the tangled maze of last week’s statements on this matter it appears that the government needs to recoup £800m from land sales post 2012, in order, says Ken Livingstone ‘to repay all the debts that we have incurred.’ I wonder whether this includes interest on the borrowed money? Somehow I doubt it. ___This figure, described as ‘conservative’ – I’ll come to this in a moment! – assumes 6% annual appreciation of the value of the land. Ken, though, reckons that the sale of land is more likely to bring in £1.8bn. This is based on annual appreciation of 16% per year, a figure that should have every investor rushing to Stratford, but which is bizarrely described by Ken as ‘quite cautious’. _____We can derive from these calculations that the land is presently worth about £470m. But to confuse the matter still further the London Mayor's director of planning and regeneration, Neale Coleman told the Commons’ Culture, Media and Sports Committee that ‘using the average land price inflation of 19% over the last 20 years, the LDA could make £3billion.’ ___This cannot be the case. If the land is now worth £470m then 19% annual appreciation takes its value to £2.3bn. You would need 23% annual appreciation before you got £3bn. ___This little political spat raises all sorts of questions, of which whether or not Ken Livingstone and his henchmen can do maths is the least important. The two big questions are: what is conservative? And, is the past any guide to the future? ____A 'conservative' consumption? _The so-called conservative assumption that the value of land in the Stratford region of East London will grow at ‘only’ 6% per year is based on the fact that this apparently was the appreciation recorded in the worst year of the last twenty. _That may be true, but anybody who assumes that the value of anything will appreciate above the rate of inflation and above the level of long-term interest rates is, at the very least, not allowing for the possibility that something could go wrong. This has echoes of Northern Rock, whose chief executive Adam Applegarth said that its business strategy worked very well ‘until the credit crunch came along’. _The reason that we conservatively put a roof on top of our houses is because we cannot be sure that the sun will always shine. That is conservatism. Was the possibility of a recession between now and 2012 not considered? Or was the possibility that there might be a hiccough in the property bull market conveniently forgotten in the urgency of siphoning off the Lottery money? _Did it not strike anyone that 6% per annum is actually quite a high figure? And that Ken’s ‘quite cautious’ 18% is just fantastic? The justification is the apparent 20% or so annual rise in land values in the area over the last twenty years. But might this not have been because land values in Stratford have been bid up in anticipation of the Olympic effect? For sure, this has been the case. _Taking London as a whole, the price of a hectare of land has risen from £759,000 in 1983 to £5.5m now. That represents an annual rise of less than 9%. So Stratford has already far outpaced the capital. Is this because Stratford is a wonderfully attractive place to live? Or could it be because several sharp property speculators have seen the Olympics cruising into view and have been busy buying up land in anticipation? _I think you know the answer to that. So will land values in Stratford rise by 6% per year, allowing the Lottery Fund to get its money back? Perhaps – but it is by no means certain. Will land values continue to rise at 16%, or 19% or 23% per annum. Not a hope! This article is taken from Tom Bulford's free daily email Penny Sleuth " __
By©Muhammad Haque

1220 Hrs GMT London Monday 21 January 2008:_More than fifty persons in the East End of London have signed a new campaign declaration in a matter of four hours and reaffirmed their commitment against Crossrail hole. This is from one part of the Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area where Khoodeelaar! Has been mobilising opposition against the CrossRail assault. _The local residents responded to Khoodeelaar! Campaign information that the current procedural period to register opposition to the ‘CrossRail Bill’ in the UK House of Lords was due to end in a matter of days. _It is expected that more than 100 others will sign their commitment and back the Khoodeelaar! formal objections to the CrossRail Bill to be put to the House of Lords this week. _At a campaign meeting held in the Whitechapel area, new condemnation was made against the local Tower Hamlets Council for continuing to lie to the local community about the Council’s collusion for the CrossRail hole plot. _[To be continued] _[Texts from an earlier part of this Khoodeelaar! commentary by MUHAMMAD HAQUE and as published by Khoodeelaar! on the Internet today Monday 21 January 2008] _Khoodeelaar! The East London Campaign against the ‘Crossrail hole plot’ [the ‘Crossrail Bill’] updating the publication of the evidential context for the demand being reiterated this week to the UK Parliament [‘house of lords] to scrap the ‘Crossrail bill’ and to recommend that the transport needs of London and the relevant other parts of the country are addressed by the uk govt giving priority to what the transport needs of the ordinary public are, what the sustainable solution is… _Khoodeelaar! asks the UK House of Lords [the ‘upper chamber’ of parliament- which in practice is the ‘lower caber’…] to show that it is acing in its role on making UK legislation in a universally objectively describable constitutionally compatible manner and that it, the UK House of Lords is and active and rigorous, ethical, intelligent and up-to-date forum for the competent, truthful, honest and timely scrutiny of any legislative proposal. ……. _Khoodeelaar! Question as put to the House of Lords this morning [Monday 21 January 2008] is in the context of the statement made by [Alistair Darling who at the time was] the Secretary of state for Transport as he introduced the ‘Crossrail Bill’ into the UK [lower chamber of parliament] House of Commons in February 2005. As he did so, the Secretary of State said that he was satisfied that the Bill was ‘compatible with the Convention’. _That was not true then. _That is not true now. _Because the ‘petitioning programme’ that is currently on about the objections against the Crossrail Bill [that is now in the House of lords] is being seriously restricted, the Khoodeelaar campaign is demanding to know how the House of lords can justify the restrictions and also claim that they are ding s by acting within the constitutional obligations _The following is quoted from the UK House of Lords administrative office guidance notes about petitioning against the Crossrail Bill. _The answer stated in the quoted part is in contravention of the ECHR. _"CAN I OBJECT TO THE BILL AS A WHOLE? _No. _The Committee will only be able to consider aspects of the project proposed in the bill, which affect people in their private capacity, not fundamental principles involving broader issues (such as whether a cross-London rail link should be constructed). Those issues are discussed and decided by the House of Lords itself (during a debate on the bill on the floor of the House of Lords). _The Committee cannot make recommendations on matters of principle nor do they have the power to reject the bill. _There is no point, therefore, in making political comments, raising general objections to the bill or in raising broad issues of policy in your petition, you should concentrate instead on the specific ways in which the bill directly and specially affects you or those you represent."

[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque

0800 Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 January 2008
_
Khoodeelaar! No to ‘Crossrail hole’ plot, No to ‘CRASS rail lies’ like ‘high speed link needed to Heathrow to keep London at the top of the league of world class cities’ - lies that Ken Livingstone has been uttering…

1. KHOODEELAAR! campaigners from the Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 area set to ask NEW and UPDATED questions and put them to the [‘legislative’] UK House of Lords to demand that the promoter of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ [now in the ‘House of Lords’], the UK Transport Secretary Ruth Kelly [MP] produce immediately unambiguous evidence that there is economic justification, there is environmental justification for spending £Billions of public money for a project that is peddled by its peddlers at its ‘most justifiable’ to be one about RUSHING passengers to Heathrow airport and then depositing them into an airport of waiting, of waste, of congested contaminated desperation…._2. What is the point of Crossrail…… _3. And other questions…._4. Khoodeelaar! SAYING NO to the congestion of lies by CRASSRail hole-plot backer Ken Livingstone… _5. Those lies can no longer be ignored by the ‘mainstream’… _6. The lies that they told in the ‘London’ ‘evening standard’ for Crossrail… _7. On the one hand the ‘evening standard’ and the lying CRASSRail hole-plotters denounced the ‘long hours, even days’ of waiting chaos at Heathrow and on the other and in almost the same breath they lied and said that CROSSRAIL was ‘vital’ to LINK with Heathrow… _8. Now, where do they propose to take the public once they RUSH them at high speed to Heathrow? _9. What happens when Heathrow is congested? _10. What is the point of the pointless CRASSrail then? …. _[To be continued]
_. The CURRENT campaign news, information and commentary being created for Khoodeelaar! By the AADHIKAR Media Foundation and published on the Internet is focussed on the CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. What is Khoodeelaar! doing to bring about compliance with the UK’s European Treaty obligations in the conduct of making laws in the UK. Khoodeelaar! is at once embarked on a multi-faceted programme of defence of the ordinary public in London and by extension across the UK against the illegal, unconstitutional, illegitimate behaviour on the part of the UK executive. As this week’s ‘comments’ in the ‘mainstream’ media in the UK has been about the near-disaster [that was, according to a number of news reports, averted only by a worrying 20 seconds!!!] at the Heathrow airport which reportedly occurred when Gordon Brown was in the vicinity, the Khoodeelaar! campaign is going to put appropriate legal and constitutional law emphasis on the demand that it has already put to Gordon Brown’s administration to show the evidence of uncorrupted correlation between the various claims that the Government has been making for the Big Business CrossRail hole plot. Of specific importance is the claim that has been made with insane fanaticism, and echoed by a Ken Livingstone-compromised Gordon Brown in the weeks and months between 1 October 2007 and 1 December 2007, to the effect that one of the most vital ECONOMIC arguments and justifications for Crossrail was that it would link up Heathrow airport with the rest of the ‘City of London’. Now that even Frank Field, MP [Birkenhead, England] [on the BBC Radio 4 programme 'Any Question' as broadcast on Friday 18 and Saturday 19 January 2008] has called Heathrow airport obsolete and assorted other commentators have been able to speak out against any plans to create another terminal at Heathrow airport, questions that Khoodeelaar! has already put to Ruth Kelly [the Current 'Crossrail hole plot-promoting UK Secretary of State at the Department for Transport'] will be updated and reinforced. 2007
_. Khoodeelaar! will show the constitutional law way forward for solving the genuine transport needs of London
_. Khoodeelaar! dissecting the language of CrossRail lies by Crossrail promoters
_. Khoodeelaar! evidence of constitutional and democratic questions as put to the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council – the past four years
_. Khoodeelaar! questions to the several relevant UK MPs
_. Khoodeelaar! questions to the office concerned in the UK House of Lords dealing with the House of Lords ‘consideration’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’
_. Khoodeelaar! diagnosis of the unconstitutionality of the behaviour of Ruth Kelly, Tom Harris and their co-ministers and post-holders in the uk Department for Transport
_. Khoodeelaar! invokes the ‘lessons’ of 1988 and the follies of the PRE-Crossrail UK Department for Transport and their THEN idiocies which exposed the UK Government of the day [Maggie Thatcher] to Europe-wide ridicule [ as based on the UK's Government’s UNCONSTITUTIONAL, unethical and dishonest behaviour] in a big way
_. Khoodeelaar! constitutional law updates against the drafting of, the proceedings about and the promotion of the current ‘Crossrail Bill’
_. Khoodeelaar! campaign updates
_. Khoodeelaar! breaking news


_By Muhammad Haque_1410 Hrs GMT_London Thursday 17 January 2008_As I have been saying for the past almost eight years – since I came across a piece of paper issued by the CRASSrail hole plot-inviting clique in Tower Hamlets – the scheme would bring no benefits to the East End. It could not do so. What is more, the TRANSPORT needs of the UK as a whole or even those of ‘England and Wales’ [my phraseology is devolving here in ‘line’ with the ‘Scottish’ accent....] would not be addressed unless the entire schema was thoroughly revised by taking into truthful account all the factors involved. The KEY factor that I have been stressing ALL Along – and one which is the reason why I decided to label the ‘decision-making’ perpetrators as the ‘corrupt claque’ in control of the Tower Hamlets Council, is that of the deliberate policy of neglecting the ‘education’ of the children, the young people and the adults in the borough of Tower Hamlets… It is this particular one that today’s [Thursday 17 January 2008] Times newspaper group website acknowledges in their presentation of the ‘findings’. The Wigan web site is also vindicating, in effect, what I have said and what I shall continue to say on the evidence and on the facts against the ghastly inappropriateness of the WASTEFUL Crossrail scam.. That CRSSRAIL cist is bad for the rest of the economy just as it is for the overall transport needs of London people…[To be continued]
View HERE today's [Thursday 17 January 2008] anger against CRASSRail is being expressed in Wigan
_
By Muhammad Haque_1408 Hrs GMT_London Thursday 17 January 2008
View HERE today's reporting of the CRASSrail costs overruns as pub shed by the Times, London, newspaper group
_
By Muhammad Haque_1400 Hrs GMT_London Thursday 17 January 2008_CRASSrail hole plot-backer London FT confesses to having lied in the time before Gordon Brown ‘made the announcement about the public funding of the’ CRASS ‘rail’ scheme. View HERE the ‘news’ report as published by the London 'FT' [='Financial Times'] today, Thursday 17 January 2008, making confession to the lies and also vindicating – [without ever wanting to; to want to d so would show that they were ethically able to recognise the truth or to support the truthful campaign]- what the Khoodeelaar! analysis has always maintained: that the claim, as made by the pluggers of the CRASSRail project to the effect that it, CRASSrail, would bring ‘benefits’ to areas like the East London borough of Tower Hamlets was a multi-layered, poisonous, corrupting, criminally negligent untruth of indescribable social irresponsibility
[To be continued]
___CLICK HERE to view the LATEST Khoodeelaar! 'No to Crossrail hole Bill’ campaign news, INCLUDING the updated texts of the summary of the Khoodeelaar! CONSTITUTIONAL LAW objections being put to the UK House of Lords against the purpose, against the promotion, against the contents and against the procedures attached to the ‘Crossrail Bill’ in the UK Parliament [as has been evident in the behaviour of the holder of the post of Secretary of State – UK cabinet Minister - for Transport since February 2005] and as has been evident in the behaviour of the corrupt unconstitutional, unethical, prejudiced, spiteful, ignorant, time-serving bureaucracy that was in control of the pathetic, the parasitical, the undignified ‘CrossRail Bill; ‘select committee’ ‘of MPs [more later on that disgraceful episode at the behest of the Big Business-linked Tony Blaired UK Govt administration used by Big Business to promote Crossrail as the cover to loot the UK public ] comments and legal updates on the CURRENT Khoodeelaar! Campaign Action against the Crossrail hole plot. ……
Poverty of the Blairing assault by Gordon Brown on the inner city East End of London - New feature here soon

Poverty of the ‘Tower Hamlets schools performance propaganda’ - New feature here soon

Other web sites and web pages that regularly carry the AADHIKARonline contents include [as at 1045 Hrs GMT on Thursday 17 January [ 2008] __www.aadhikar.com_www.cbruk.com_www.khoodeelaar.com_and_khoodeelaar.wordpress.com

Today’s [Thursday 17 January 2008] editions of AADHIKARonline and the related web sites jointly publishing the arguments and the moral, the democratic, the social and the constitutional defence of the inner city East End of London against the CRASSrail hole project being pushed through the UK Houses of Parliament by a morally compromised Gordon Brown - will include the Muhammad Haque daily world ethicality commentary examining the rising tide of corrupt and lack of morality in the behaviour of the Gordon Brown ‘administration'’. _why Gordon brown must behave in transparently honest and accountable and constitutional manner and move to scrap the CRASSrail hole bill_why the liars for CrossRail – as being exposed in effect via the big business-linked ‘construction industry professionals’ [see the reports in the ft and the times newspapers, today, Thursday 17 January 2008] should be asked to resign al the publicly paid for posts and positions that they hold or are seeking to hold__How Peter Hain’s allegedly unique imbroglio is in fact and on the facts part and parcel of the corruption that is endemic in the Britain that Gordon Brown so ridiculously boasts about. _When Brown imperiously utters the imperialistic slogans and couches them all in his even more ridiculously irrelevant and inappropriate phrase pronounced in his ridiculously placed and contrived pr-racist accent as British vah-loos’ does he do that in the knowledge that right across the inner cities in the UK ‘mainland’ where most of the impoverished people ‘live’, there are cabals of Blair-praising, Gordon Brown-applauding careerists, little time servers and propagandists that are funded under various corrupting UK state schemes and that these cabals are there only to be used to keep the largest numbers of the deprived, the impoverished under control? And that he, Gurdon Brown ‘knows’ that these cabals are made up of exhibition-standard ethnicity-linked surrogates, ethnic surrogates who will be put on parade whenever the thrust of the new Discrimination, the newel inequality that Brown is plotting is felt by the majority of the targeted people in the inner cities? Does he, Gordon Brown, mean the likes that the beleaguered ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone has been wheeling out at regular publicity intervals recently? Does Brown also feel ‘assured’ that the likes of the state-sponsored agents of racism in Britain today, as personified and typified by Trevor the Terrible P-lips, will serve en as the couriers of corruption that Gordon Brown wants to infect the ordinary people across the inner cities with? _[To be continued]

Muhammad Haque questions BBC TV plug for Crossrail hole plot-backer Ken Livingstone, today

The dishonestly edited BBC ‘London’ news TV programme is set to give Ken Livingstone yet another promotion at the scheduled broadcast of a propaganda ‘interview’ at 1830 Hrs GMT today. _Khoodeelaar! Is telling the programme’s ‘political editor’ Tim Donovan to distance himself from the sleaze-ball Ken Livingstone-accommodating BBC agenda and actually use the available evidence of misconduct, misuse of office and powers and give Livingstone a serous interrogation. __Will Donovan do it? _Will Donovan be allowed by the corrupt BBC _executives to do it?

CROSSRAIL hole GHOSTS haunting Whitechapel in the early hours of Monday morning ! _CROSSRAIL hole-plotters’ ghastly self-promotion and photo opportunity near the GHOST Bus service heading for Whitechapel! – And how the ‘local’ ‘independent’ ‘newspaper’ the East London Idiotiser aids and abets the CRASSRail hole plot-backing trio of John Biggs, Denise Jones and Jim F.Patrick ! – Part 1
the east London Idiotiser’ behaves in typically idiotic fashion when it manages to spend time and resource in promoting the petty careeristic agenda of not one but as many as three CrossRail hole plot-backers against the east end of London. And the idiotic ‘newspaper’ fails to mention the CRASSRail plot in an over-lengthy piece that it then parades on its equally ignorantly-‘edited’ web site. The task of getting the spin by the CrossRail hole three is first undertaken by another web site and by the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against Crossrail hole plot..__with ‘journalism’ like that as displayed by the ‘East London Idiotiser’ there is no way that the community in the East End of London can get the vital information and reporting service we deserve if we are to be able to defend ourselves against the Big Business-dictated, US-multi-national-Bechtel-lobby-created agenda being carried out by the East London-derived ‘public offices’ being held disrespectfully by John Biggs, Denise Jones and Jim F Patrick

[To be continued]


On 10 January 2008, the London Times newspaper published another economics-related comment on the ‘CrossRail’ ‘scheme’. Although a promotional piece, it still contained enough evidence of the lack of merit in the present CrossRail 'scheme'. From an economic standpoint. The author of the times piece had previously written on CrossRail far more critically. That was in September 2007. On that occasion, Khoodeelaar! Had analysed the published position of the times newspaper and in the time since then, several items have been published on the times web site as stated by Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque. Most of those comments have been about – and against - the breaches by the CrossRail hole plot-backer [Blaired-Brown] government of the uk’s constitutional obligations /h2>

By©Muhammad Haque_1000 Hrs GMT London Monday 14 January 2008_A London community denounces ‘CrossRail station’ plans truly awful. Why are the plans being denounced as awful? Because of the lies that the CrossRail hole plot backer local council told in justifying its collusion with The Crossrail hole plot… but the lying council on this occasion - significant this - is not tower hamlets. Just like tower hamlets council though. That one is across the river in south London. Khoodeelaar! Will be publishing another updated exposition of the lies that local councils have been telling to and against the communities in the ‘councils’ ‘areas’ and affected by the CRASSRail hole plot activities…

Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole Bill - the constitutional law Ground-Part 10
_
Khoodeelaar! Interpretation of the UK ‘constitution’ By©Muhammad Haque_0820 Hrs GMT_London__Monday 14 January 2008 The assertion made to Parliament [the House of Commons] By the Secretary of State’ that the ‘CrossRail Bill’ was ‘compatible’ with the European Conventions, has been Untrue. _The Conventions have been violated by the Secretary of State at every Crucial point. __The Secretary of State as the ‘promoter’ of the CRASSRail Scam [the ‘Crossrail Bill’ in its various forms to date] in Parliament has also breached the UK’s Human Rights Act And the Freedom of Information Act AS PART OF and in The process of the breaches of the ECHR. _Among other UK statutory and common law obligations in The context of the ECHR. _The breaches have not been either warranted by or related To or precipitated by any evidentially rationally, legally, Constitutionally and truthfully and fairly and justly and Transparently and ethically conceivable ground that any UK Secretary of State can advance [or could have advanced in The period since the actual ‘CrossRail Bill’ was introduced Into the UK parliament] in justifying any actual or Notionally exercisable or available ‘right to the specific Derogation’ from the UK’s Treaty obligations._[To be continued]

Muhammad Haque daily constitutional law commentary – on the urgent need for the ‘House of Lords’, the UK Upper chamber in Parliament, to wake up and hood the Government to account. The 'House of Lords' could make a start by rigorously scrutinizing the ‘Crossrail Bill’ and its purpose and its implications…
_1630 Hrs GMT London _Sunday 13 January 2008:
The role of the ‘Upper chamber’ [the House of Lords] [in the Uk parliament] is often not even mentioned, let alone recognised. Yet it could be a significant alternative to the servility of the House of Commons. Now, isn’t that a prospect! If only we had members in the Upper Chamber actually prepared to speak out on issues that matter. If we had the House of Lords really holding the ‘executive' to account by way of subjecting the CrossRail Bill to the kind of rigorous examination that the Bill actually warrants but has been allowed to escape in the House of Commons
To be continued
Earlier on Sunday 13 January 2008:
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN Organiser Muhammad Haque published the latest challenge to ‘London mayor election’ [scheduled to be held on 1 May 2008] ‘candidate’ Brian Paddick to state how he, Brian Paddick, would do anything AGAINST Crossrail when his ‘party’ [The Liberal Democrats] were ALL for the CrossRail scheme
By©Muhammad Haque 1135 Hrs GMT London Sunday 13 January 2008 “Given that there is a belated awareness in some sections of the ‘mainstream’ media of the need to hold the holder of the post of ‘mayor of London’ to account and given that Mr Paddick himself evaluates his own position as being in many ways unique - relying as he does on the fact of his police career – and most importantly, given his public disagreement with the current commissioner of police on a number of issues all to do with points of principle, isn’t it incumbent on Mr Paddick to explain why he has contradicted so many of his ‘party’s’ ’spokespersons’ on Crossrail and how, in this context he thinks he can carry out any policies that counter the position of his ‘party’ in the conceptual eventuality of his getting elected ‘mayor of London’?” [To be continued]
<


Jus how widespread has been the LYING and the misconduct by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council? Has the Khoodeelaar! Campaign been ‘exaggerating’ in any way in whatever we have been saying [now for the past 4 years] about the role,. The behaviour of the controlling clique on the Crossrail hole-peddling Tower Hamlets Council? Khoodeelaar! Has established a unique library of original work encompassing ALL aspects of the Crossrail hole-inviter Tower Hamlets Council. So unique and politically significant that our work is now recognised internationally. Khoodeelaar! Has been recognised - that is known as a reliable source of informed commentary about the state of Gordon Brown’s 'Britain' - now as being one of the most widely known and constitutionally active campaigns in the UK.. We show new evidence constituting the ground on which Khoodeelaar! Is internationally recognised.... … We show that Owen Whalley, the employee who has been placed in the role of operating the controlling clique's Blairising [that word, ‘Blairising’ has been just devised and used here for the first time, in this edition of the AADHIKARonline, at 1103 Hrs GMT Sunday 13 January 2008 –] agenda of INVITING the Crossrail hole problems upon the East End of London community, has been left out to dry, as it were, by the controlling clique… Because 'unknown' = allegedly, as we do not have reason to believe what Mr Whalley says either] to Whalley, the others, his ‘political controllers’ on the corrupt Council, KNOW and have known for a long while, that they have been BLOCKING Khoodeelaar! Communications to the corrupt Council…. Just as the ‘lead’ ! Member for degeneration was left out to rot in a limbo – but Khoodeelaar! Has been typically generous and has not taken the bait to annihilate the career of that pathetically misplaced ‘lead member’. So has Owen Whalley…. [To be continued]


Constitutional law commentary and report By©Muhammad Haque
_. Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN, organised in defence of the community in the East End of London, continuing to publish today Friday 11 January 2008 the comprehensive list of updated grounds against the ‘Crossrail Bill’ [now in the UK Parliament's ‘upper chamber’ the ‘House of Lords’ at ‘Westminster’] , including the exposition where relevant of the unconstitutional behaviour and dishonesty by the agents, the post-holders and the touts operating in the name of the community and installed in the 'public' bodies and groups, ‘platforms and forums including the following
_. the ‘Greater London Authority’
_. the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets London Borough Council
_. the Parliamentary constituencies of Bethnal Green and Bow and Poplar and Lime house/Poplar and Canning Town [whichever description of that constituency is appropriate, relevant and valid - this is a reference to the Boundary Commission's activities]
_. the CLRL company
_. Transport For London [=tfl]
_. The Department for Transport [=DfT]
_. the House of Commons ‘CrossRail Bill’ ‘select committee’ and its bureaucracy
_. The House of Commons ‘Sergeant at Arms’
_. the House of Commons 'Speaker's Secretariat and office



London CrossRail hole-plot-backer minister tom Harris and his DfT boss Ruth Kelly are exposed as being untenable. As is the big business agent in the house of lords j valentine… in a comment published today [Thursday 10 January 2008] by a blogger from Manchester [more on the guardian’s role, later] CLICK HERE to view a pdf version of the blog

By©Muhammad Haque 2050 hrs GMT_London_Thursday_10 January 2008
How is it possible that Churning fake News [=’Channel Four News’] has been able to flaunt both the Crossrail hole plot-tout Ken Livingstone and the universally guilty Tony Blair among the ‘short listed’ for political awards? Time to scrap Jon ‘Slow’ Snow and his corrupting Churning Fake News programme
_Whenever channel four news boasts about itself, it flaunts the face of Jon ‘slow’ Snow, as if his image is somehow synonymous with ‘accuracy, immediacy, relevance, integrity, accountability, transparency, truthfulness, courage, investigation and ethics and morality…’! _Or may be they flaunt his face in idle ignorance of any of the above criteria, which I attach to what should be a news programme on a ‘channel that I helped to found’! The truth of the matter is that I had feared that the ‘much-needed fourth TV channel’ that we were arguing for in the 1970s, might turn out to be yet another corrupting TV outlet for the organised gangs of crooks that wear ties and brag about their having 'gone to' the same gangster schools called ‘public’ schools and so on… _It was inevitable that I had to start campaigning again - almost immediately after Channel Four began broadcasting at the beginning of the 1980s - against the criminals that the [fourth] channel began to employ In the 25 years or so since the corrupting channel came to being, things have not got better as far as the peoples’ right to have truthful TV station or programme is concerned. Channel 4 in fact became identified as the Porn Channel and as if to prove that the BBC was no better than the Brothelliser, Corrupting corporation, the discredited, lying outfit then hired Michael Grade, ‘the Pornographer in chief' [as the Daily Mail was able to label him] as the BBC’s 'salvaging chairman! _How the criminals have prevailed… _To a point that this evening [Thursday 10 January 2008], the ghastly ‘news’ programme featured ken the CrossRail hole plot-tout as one of the 'Channel 4 News programme's ‘short listed’ political awards nominees! Including none other than Tony Bliar himself shown as being a ‘nominee’ for the award covering an entire decade…. _And this on the very day when news broke of Blair’s having been employed by yet another war-mongering, pro-nukes outfit, paying Bliar a reported one million dollar per year for a few minutes’ presence on their board a month….. What c4 news should have concentrated on, instead of parading the Bliar as if he had done no harm to the world. Here was a man who took part in the causing of and in the justifying of the murders of uncounted numbers of innocent people in Asia ….. And Jon slow was parading Bliar as the first face on the so-called short listed 6…. _If Gordon brown had not unintentionally exposed ofcom [in the past few days] as the corrupt outfit that ofcom itself is [brown hired as his spin doctor OFCOM’s former boss], I would almost certainly have called for ofcom to investigate the churning fake news itself! _No wonder that when Jon slow began to ‘interview’ john Hutton, Gordon brown’s nuclear minister, there was hardly any substance to the stock phrases that slow included in his routine… [to be continued]

By©Muhammad Haque_0520 Hrs GMT_LondonThursday 10 January 2008
Big Business Crossrail hole plot is CrossRail. Now it is getting to be derided as if it is CURSED rail! _As if the ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone’s insidious scheme is a measure of serious flaws in the very thinking, the very manoeuvring of the once ‘prudent’ ‘economics’ man Gordon Brown_That is the view of one writer published this morning by the Daily Telegraph group in London. Ineptitude is what Gordon Brown is being accused of. And excess costs. Linked with CrossRail. The writer says there is a much better and more economic solution available ….as compared with the costs and the irrelevance of CrossRail!

To be continued

The MUHAMMAD HAQUE daily world ethical commentary _1200 Hrs GMT_London Tuesday 8 January 2008
_Coming later on today [8 January 2008] in the Muhammad Haque daily ethical commentary on Gordon Brown the examination of the following aspects of the uk premier who has already given the phrase ‘British vah-loos’ a precariously dubious identity…._How is it ‘British vah-loos’ to attack the people pushed into involuntary poverty and deprivation BY Brown’s own administration? How is it ‘British vah-loos’ to maintain discrimination and violate the ethical aspects of peoples’ rights while deriding the targeted people undergoing these assaults for not showing enough initiative? What initiatives does Gordon Brown in office at no 10 Downing Street, recognise as being consistent with his appreciation of ‘British vah-loos’? How is it that there are increasing numbers of ‘British’ people who are being pushed into rotting existence due to the failures of the state, the failures which Brown has been significantly reluctant to see in time ? Or see at all? How can Brown claim to know what any ‘vah-loos’ are when he is the prime minister who has been found with no acceptable explanation for the financial disasters that have come to light, not to speak of the robbery of peoples’ privacy contrary to their universal human rights? [to be continued]
How is it that so many items of evidence in Gordon Brown’s behaviour since he officially assumed the tenancy at No 10 Downing Street London SW1 in 2007 have been cited by the entire spectrum of ‘mainstream media commentators’ to support their derisive conclusive about Brown’s competence [etc] and not one of those items has been acknowledged as being remotely to do with Brown’s clouded collusion with the CRASSRail hole plotter Ken Livingstone? How long before these commentators agree with an echo the Khoodeelaar! Dissection of Gordon Brown’s seriously ill-advised and unjustifiable hype for the Big Business CRASSRail? And does Gordon Brown really understand the implications of What he is desperately letting himself in for? I mean, does Gordon Brown really have the democratic ability or the moral legitimacy to really take on people who care about and selflessly defend the environment?
_[To be continued]

_Muhammad Haque daily commentary_1350 Hrs GMT London Sunday 6 January 2008


’Difficult decisions! ‘Tough year 2008’! Gordon Brown again promoted Andrew Maar to the de facto post of a platform, which should have belonged in the Houses of parliament. And Brown should have been subjected to the overdue scrutiny on each and every single one of his assertions as he made those to the undeserved promotion of Andrew Maar and the BBC. That post would have existed if we had an accountable, assertive Parliament in the UK. Gordon Brown is abusing the position of Prime Minister just in the same way that Tony Blair did. And the abuse is going to get worse during this year. Appearing on the Andrew Marr Show, which is in fact the courier of the same baggage and garbage of propaganda that was stinkingly foisted on the viewing public/people with the over-oiled face of David Frost.. It is clear that if there has been any change after Frost vacated that slot which now flaunts Andrew Maar as the occupant] it has been for the worse. Gordon Brown has been able to make utterances on it that no self-resetting 'national' [meaning central UK] constituency in a 'world class' [!!! More on that crass slogan so fanatically promoted by Brown's 'new mate' the 'undone mayor' Ken Livingstone] should put up with from such a facile and banal occupier of No 10 Downing Street… His courtiers may not have told Gordon Brown this yet. But he is in danger of becoming ridiculously incredible unless he stops making these appearances.. I am going to do the scrutiny of four of his key utterances as made via the Andrew Marr embarrassment called the interview..

[To be continued]

By©Muhammad Haque_1148 Hrs GMT_London Friday 4 January 2008__On Tuesday 8 January 2008, Khoodeelaar! Will put to the ‘CrossRail Bill’ ‘select committee’ in the UK ‘House of Lords’ the summarised version of the key objections to the contents and the purpose of the Bill. We shall do so in the knowledge of the ‘guidelines’ already published by the bureaucracy of the House of Lords concerning the objections and the remits. We shall be doing s in accordance with the UK’s constitutional obligations to afford due and full contents and evidence of the objections to be presented to the UK Parliament against the CrossRail Bill. Throughout the period of the House of Lords committee’s ‘consideration’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ we shall be publishing every day appropriate additional updates, news reports and constitutional law commentaries here and on other related Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole Bill CAMPAIGN web sites, blogs and other internet and electronic platforms. _For the LATEST Khoodeelaar! 'No to Crossrail hole Bill’ campaign news, comments and legal updates on the Khoodeelaar! Action against the Crossrail hole plot, CLICK HERE.

Khoodeelaar! Is the campaign against the London Crossrail hole plot Bill [the draft piece of legislation – a hybrid Bill, called the ‘CrossRail Bill’ - that is now being moved through the UK houses of parliament at the behest of Big Business interests prevailing over Gordon Brown’s administration. The Big Business lobby is set to loot UK ordinary peoples' money - we distinguish between 'taxpayers' money and the peoples' money - more on this at a later edition]. Khoodeelaar! Is a Seelotee [< ‘Sylhetti’ < ‘Sylhet’] language word devised by Muhammad Haque in the East End of London, to signify the defence against and to denote the destructive agenda by big business that has been afoot under covers of plots like the Crossrail hole scam. Khoodeelaar! Is the campaign that has created a new and current foundation of argument based on the evidence that is universally independently objectively verifiable. The arguments are at once revenant to the east end of London as we as to the rest of the inner cities UK. By accessible extension, the arguments are as valid in the east end of London as they are in those parts of other ‘western’ cities where income and social disparity are the essential ingredients of the [classic] capitalist [and its variants that are manifest in the local forms, mechanisms and scams of ] exploitation regimes. Khoodeelaar! Is currently preparing a series of constitutional law representations against the contents and the purpose of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ …that constitutional law campaign by Khoodeelaar! Defending the community in the East End of London begins in the first week of January 2008. Visit this and associated web sites to stay in touch with that stage of the universal and the historic campaign for the upholding of the rights of the people of the east End of London – and by extension of the advocacy in principle of those of the rights of all the pressurized, violated, disenfranchised destitute peoples in the UK inner cities and of the other parts of the world- and for the voicing of the rights in principle of the vast majority whose voices are not heard in the UK parliament... If with no complete success in on and referring to at the next level and stage of our campaign which will be taken before getting the ‘select committee in the UK Parliament’s Upper Chamber [the ‘House of Lords’] to agree with our aims …._for the records_Records that we shall be relying e the European judicial and constitutional platforms
The 1st Edition of the day of the AADHIKARonline London UK was updated at 0500 Hrs GMT on Tuesday 5 February 2008


Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Stepney, London E1 area, UK, campaign against Big Business Crossrail hole plot [as contained in the current ‘Crossrail Bill’ in the UK ‘House of Lords’ the ‘Upper Chamber’ of the UK Parliament] against the East End of London.

East London Against Crossrail hole plotter Ken Livingstone as mayor of London [Mire details shortly]
_. Related external web sites and blog publishers to AADHIKARonline include
_.
_. www.aadhikar.com
_. www.cbruk.com
_. www.khoodeelaar.com
_. www.khoodeelaar.wordpress.com


__http://povertyofgordonbrownandhisvahloos.blogspot.com_

_CLICK HERE for the LATEST KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot campaign action news and info. Also to view the latest KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law and evidential documents and materials. These are being published as part of the formal KHOODEELAAR! objections presented to the UK House of Lords ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘SELECT COMMITTEE’. __In case you cannot get access by hypertext from here, log on, after 1200 Hrs GMT on Tuesday 5 February 2008 to khoodeelaar.wordpress.com for the texts in full of the key objections against the ‘Crossrail Bill’ by Khoodeelaar! and the Khoodeelaar! Constitutional law commentary against the present CrossRail Bill [currently in the UK Parliamentary House of Lords] The Khoodeelaar! objections have been submitted on Wednesday [30 January 2008] and will be followed by updates and contextual reports on this and related web sites carrying materials from the considered campaign against the Crossrail hole plot…. also on this web site we shall be posting KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN information and commentary regarding the overall social, economic, environmental, cultural, historic, political, legal and constitutional settings, backgrounds and evidence as part of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign in defence of the East End of London community against the Big Business Crossrail hole plot..
All materials as published by AADHIKAR MEDIA FOUNDATION here [except those that we occasionally refer to and quote from external sources - the sources are clearly identified and their authorship/s is/are acknowledged] are originally conceived, researched, written and Edited. The fact that they are published for 'free' access via the internet must not be confused with their being legally and ethical and moray unprotected. The materials are NOT to be reprinted or re-published in any form except [and only] with the full legal and IPR statements as published by the AADHIKAR Media Foundation and the Editor being also included in full._For legal, intellectual property rights permission and licence and details, send your request in full initially in an e-mail to_aadhikarlaw@yahoo.co.uk__This should be done before any assumption of consent, permission or agreement

The 1st Edition of the day of the AADHIKARonline London UK was updated at 0500 Hrs GMT on Tuesday 5 February 2008

This web site is being brought to you by AADHIKAR Media Foundation supporting Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Stepney, London E1 area, UK, campaign against the Big Business-dictated Crossrail hole plot [as contained in the current ‘Crossrail Bill’ in the UK ‘House of Lords’ the ‘upper chamber’ of the UK Parliament] against the East End of London. __[More info later]


MUHAMMAD HAQUE ethical commentary on the poverty of Gordon Brown’s preaching ‘British vah-loos’ when the country has several million people in abject poverty and indignity

2225 HRS GMT London 4 February 2008: KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! TO THE ‘CROSSRAIL-BANNED LONDON CYCLISTS’ - ____KHOODEELAAR! NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE PLOT [THE ‘CROSSRAIL BILL’ NOW IN THE UK PARLIAMENT _– ‘HOUSE OF LORDS’] CAMPAIGN: __in the context of the reality of Gordon Brown’s shutting his eyes to x truth about poverty and injustice being caused to millions of ‘British’ people! Gordon Brown’s ‘endorsement’ –_however allegedly reluctantly – of and statement of commitment of £billions of public money to the London CRASSRail scam flaunted for big business by Ken Livingstone, shows that Brown does not possess the ethical credibility to claim that he has a moral position that can be distinguished from Tony Blair’s…given that the current ‘CROSSRAIL BILL’ [as at Monday 4 February 2008] is so flawed, given that the main flaws are to be found in the messy, irrational and uneconomic contents of the plan; _also the fact that Gordon Brown chose to ignore the key findings of the Eddington report [into the ‘FUTURE OF RAILWAY’ TRANSPORT IN THE UK – a report which Brown himself had commissioned whilst still the uk finance minister] – Eddington advised Brown AGAINST backing Crossrail [as reported by Channel 4 News, more on this source in a later report]. ___KHOODEELAAR! is telling Gordon Brown to scrap Crossrail and show that he really des have the intelligence and the wisdom to drop what is crass and go for a reasonable, realistic and a sustainable solution to the transport needs that people of London face. __If Brown refuses to pay heed to this and stubbornly defies rationality then it will be his fault and he will have to take the blame when CRASSrail and the crasser consequences of it unraveling around - or behind [if it happens o be the case that he has to flee the powerful post at No 10 Downing street head of schedule -] Brown.

_______
MUHAMMAD HAQUE, the organiser of Khoodeelaar! The Campaign against Crossrail hole plot’, posted at 1025 Hrs GMT this morning [Thursday 31 January 2008] the following comment in response to a report carried by the Wimbledon Guardian


__Your item “New business is unusual in Sutton” by Lisa Williams” contains too many false comparisons. The assumptions underlying those are equally unfounded. __What you have stated will be included in the list of inaccuracies and wrong references to 'East London' that we shall be citing in the actual detailed evidence that we are preparing to present to Parliament [at the meeting/s of the UK ‘House of Lords’] ‘CROSSRAIL BILL’ ‘SELECT COMMITTEE’ to be held in probably a matter of weeks __What is supposed to be meant by “the next Canary Wharf “ ? __The PRESENT Canary Wharf is NOT about “East London”. __It never has been. __No ‘Canary Wharf’ will ever be. __You quote Chris Wood of the Sutton Chamber of Commerce as referring to “East London” as if it did not include Barking and Dagenham [mentioned in the second paragraph where you report the release of some figures by MP Paul Burstow]. __Canary Wharf was imposed on and is physically on land that is in ‘East London’ but with plans that came from a very far away place. The distance between the ordinary people and community in the parts of the East London borough of Tower Hamlets that had been populated before Canary Wharf was imposed and the commuter-culture ‘thousands’ who figure in the ‘work force’ that maintains the imposed extension cannot be adequately described in one sentence. __The difference represents several centuries of intra-societal discrimination and exploitation. __Those are being continued today with the apparently political signboards being exhibited on the geographical ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council. __As soon as the immediate surroundings could be treated as sufficiently altered to a state where the ordinary East End people could in effect be pushed further into the social exclusion zones and categories then we have begun to see the appearance, for the first time ever in this part of ‘East London’, of the "appropriate" political representation from the Canary Wharf ‘ward’ [!] on Tower Hamlets Council. __Just so that there is no room for assuming that ‘Canary Wharf’ ‘Politics’ is in any way ‘East Loudon people’s democratic or social representation politics’, the personnel manning and womanning the fronting of the ‘Canary Wharf’ political agenda have ALL been drafted in from the suitably Canary Wharf –ite Schools, stables and ideological shires in other places, not ideologically so different from the Sutton that you have in the background of the thoughts applied in your report! __These fronter are equally silent about the serious flaws in and of the Crossrail scheme. Just as they are silent on the fact that the 2012 Olympic Games hosting diversion is not going to make any qualitative improvements to the economic or the social entitlements or rights of the ordinary people across ‘East London’. __The above summarised statement represents the condition that has existed across East London where STUNTS are being staged by the likes of the current occupant in the post of the mayor of London and their co-careerists and time-servers who have been fabricating a scenario in the name of the ‘East London’ people by projecting the ‘2012 Games’ and Crossrail on to the propaganda platforms suggesting that the two things mean the people in the area will ‘benefit’. __This propaganda has been a gigantic and multi-faceted lie. __This is why for the past four years Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area Campaign against the CrossRail hole Bill [the hybrid ‘Crossrail Bill’ now in the UK Parliament – the ‘House of Lords’] has been campaigning to put the facts on the record as we as to stop the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London.


[The KHOODEELAAR! Objections to the ‘Crossrail Bill’, will be detailed in the next parts of these reports and commentaries]
Thousands of local people from across the East End of London areas affected by the Crossrail hole plot [the Crossrail Bill’ now in the UK Parliament, the ‘House of Lords’] are supporting the formal putting of the objections by the campaigning organization Khoodeelaar! to the ‘House of Lords’ against the “Crossrail Bill”


More on this and on related web sites shortly

_Muhammad Haque commentary: NO to Rail PR by EXCel London

_By©Muhammad Haque Organiser_Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole plot scam [the ‘Crossrail Bill’ now in the UK Parliament - the ‘House of Lords’] _2235 Hrs GMT_London Tuesday 29 January 2008


First comments on and response by KHOODEELAAR! NO to Crossrail hole Plot CAMPAIGN organiser Muhammad Haque to the London UK Times online promotion today Tuesday 29 January 2008 of ‘Vanessa Cotton, the managing director of events at ExCeL London’ which is situated not far from Canary Wharf in the East End of London – on a socially and economically opposite site and position to Whitechapel, Brick Lane and Stepney….


You [the London Times-online] quote Vanessa Cotton, the managing director of events at ExCeL London as saying “… when Crossrail is built, we’ll have our own station.” You don’t quote her on any aspect of the poverty, lack of education, lack of qualification, lack of jobs, lack of adequate housing or income that predominate the lives of tens of thousands in the ’same’ ‘East End’ of London. You could not quote her on any of those even if you wanted to. She would first have to have something truthful, credible, real and journalistically and topically quotable to say on those. To do so would expose her and those setting the agenda for the propaganda blitz around and for Crossrail and the 2012 hosting of the Olympic Games as the fabricators that they are. __The ‘East End of London’ is NOT going to benefit from Crossrail. Just as the hosting of the 2012 Olympic Games is not going to make any justifiable difference for the better to the lives and to the prospects of the communities across the affected parts of the East End of London. __Ordinary people who are part of the ordinary population. The benefits will go to Big Business and the categories of their colluders who are propelling the fraudulent scheme designed to enable construction conglomerates to relieve the UK public of between 20 Billion and 40 Billion pound sterling [at January 2008 prices] under a wide variety of falsehoods, inventions and untruths. __The Crossrail benefits are designed to go to the well-off and the outsiders. To the Big Business and their touts and their agents and their peddlers. __The tell tale signs are all transparent in their conduct so far. Not in their words as they would like to utter them. But in their actions. Those actions speak louder than their concealed words of hypocrisy and double lies. __The reason why the Crossrail hole plot-backers wanted to have a ‘Crossrail station’ at Whitechapel AT ALL is demonstrably a fake one. It is NOTHING to do with the people of the area. It is to use Whitechapel to reach Canary Wharf. It is ALSO to use the space and the land in this part of the East End so that some Big Business-linked property owners and speculators do not have to give up on their own prize spots of speculative East London land. __And it is to use that as a ‘benefit’ in the name of the collective ‘East End of London’ in the touting, stooging role of the Crossrail hole-plot-inviter clique on the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council. __A little to the north west of Vanessa’s ‘ ExCeL London ‘ location, life is existed on different paces. And de facto little expectations. Historically and politically, this is how the forces pushing for Crossrail scam [‘scheme’] want it. This is how the Blair regime wanted it. This is how Gordon Brown is set to continue to want it.. Last but not least, this is how the ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone wants it. __All of these power-wielding elements and agents behaving in adverse ways against the interest of the people of the Eats End of London want to use the people and the land in the East End of London to make gains by depriving the people. __By covering up the structural, the social, the institutional, the organisational denials, deprivations that have been perpetrated and perpetuated in the name of the people against whom these injustices have been operated and are being continued, the plotters, the agencies and the forces pushing for the Crassly conceived Crossrail London scam are laying the foundations for far deeper, far wider social injustice and inequality than can be detected if their propaganda words alone are taken to be their statements of intent or their purpose behind the pernicious plan. __[To be continued] _

Muhammad Haque daily commentary on the dire need for competence by those who are guaranteed payments and are paid handsomely in public bodies like the local tower hamlets council in the East End of London__just how incompetent is the local tower hamlets council? how much public money is misused, abused and wasted because of the incompetence of the personnel in place in that council? [To be continued]

The Muhammad Haque daily world ethical commentary from Gordon Brown’s Britain _2255 Hrs GMT _London Sunday 27 January 2008

Channel 4 News ‘Political Awards’, broadcast today [1900 Hrs GMT Sunday 27 January 2008] by the UK TV station Channel 4

It praises a troupe of Ken Livingstone Ethnicity Linked paraders in that broadcast. This broadcast today coincides with the appearance on the internet sites belonging to UK main stream news outlets and publishers and in the associated ‘mainstream British newspapers’ of probably the largest number of derogatory articles EVER pub shed about the ‘Undone mayor” Ken Livingstone himself in one single day.. _The contrast is historic. It is far more important than any sporadic item of accidental 'news' that might have been carried in any of the weekday bulletins fronted by Jon SLOW Snow himself. SLOW is one of the corrupt state’s genial-faced perpetrators of pernicious lies. SLOW tells lies in a digested way. So most of the zombified audience. So what on earth was this ‘Operation Black Vote’ ? Typically uninformative beneath a facade of convoluted stage effects and scenes designed to give the additional subliminal messages to the candidates for consolidated brainwashing, Jon SLOW contrived to convey clarity. He feigned affinity with anther manageable display of tokenized yoofs from downtrodden Hackney. And then they had the two-member ensemble from Wales. It had to be from Wales. The its bitsy fabrication was not concealed as a semi-political staged stunt. It was outrageously calmly exhibited in a wanton show of defiance to taste and con sense as a brazen insult of the worst kind. It was lower than the low. And Jon Slow was more shameless than any of the dodgy, shift, untrustworthy, evasive 'news' characters that have featured in any of the editions fronted by him of the Channel 4 News in the allegedly august period of the relevant past ten years… And then they had another politically dead and ethically empty and morality-free body parked in the assemblage of invitees and awardees upon whose features the Channel Four Political Award camera crew kept on focussing at every available excuse…[To be continued]

__From©Muhammad Haque_To _Editor in Chief online.editor@timesonline.co.uk_
Is it too much to ask Gordon Brown to practise compliance with the rules of constitutionality? _Or is Gordon Brown afraid that constitutionality will expose the shallowness, the waste and the unsustainability contained in the unwanted and the damaging schemes he appears intent on pushing through the unaccountably whipped Houses of the UK parliament? _The seriously flawed Department for Transport [DfT] is the only UK central Govt department that fell foul of its comprehensive constitutional obligations in a very big way more than 20 years ago. _Two decades on, the DfT seems to be being run by the same types of wrong headed, unconstitutional interests that had displayed Govt disregard for constitutional standards that the same Govt otherwise preaches and flaunts. _The DfT has been misleading the public and abusing executive influence over a cowed parliament [that is permanently whipped to let big business agenda through without practically any scrutiny] to push thorough a most empty scheme like Crossrail. Those of us opposing the seriously flawed 'Crossrail Bill' [now in the uk house of lords, the upper chamber] have been asking the DfT for the past four years to behave constitutionally. We have found that the Govt is not interested in actually observing its constitutional obligations on transport. _This is why we are preparing to mount legal challenges to the DfT [=UK Govt] as soon as the pro-Crossrail Bill-whipped formalities are over in the UK House of lords about the 'Crossrail Bill'. _Khoodeelaar! No to ‘Crossrail hole Bill’ CAMPAIGN _0100 Hrs _London _Sunday 27 January 2008

By©Muhammad Haque
2050 Hrs GMT London Saturday 26 January 2008

Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole plot [the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as it is currently in the UK ‘House of Lords’ – the ‘upper chamber’ in the UK parliament] CAMPAIGN Manifesto for London 2008 – the next parts due here during this weekend.
_By©Muhammad Haque
1440 Hrs GMT London Thursday 24 January 2008:

After Peter Hain’s resignation, it is not tenable for Gordon Brown to say that his administration is made of only truth-tellers … get Ruth Kelly to tell the truth about the CrossRail hole plot

coming here shortly

KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole Bill' [the 'Crossrail Bill’ as is in the UK ‘House of Lords’ now] CAMPAIGN - advising Gordon Brown in the hour after Peter Hain's resignation news breaks, that he, Brown should scrap the CRASSrail hole plot Bill in its present form...

Khoodeelaar! defending the community in the East End of London, situated in the ‘London Borough of Tower Hamlets’ which is described by independently active students of in income disparity [=inequality] , social exclusion and discrimination and deprivation in the UK today, as being either one of the or the most deprived inner city area in all of England .. Khoodeelaar! Says to Gordon Brown that he should scrap the attacks on the East End of London and on other counties across London that are still contained in the seriously flawed and wasteful ‘CrossRail Bill’ scheme– in the wake of the announcement in the past hour [time calculated at 1410 Hrs GMT 24 January 2008] of the much-anticipated resignation by Peter Hain from Gordon Brown’s cabinet, Khoodeelaar! Says to Gordon Brown – STOP being arrogant in showing your backing for Crossrail hole plot-backer Ken Livingstone.. Start telling the truth about the really pernicious elements that have pushed you into the corner where you had to make the bold but evidentially and objectively unjustifiable utterances fir the CRASSrail project. Listen to the people and you will stay in office… If you dismiss the people who are telling the truth and if you continue to go down the road of hypocrisy, spin and contradictions and if you get addicted to preferring to listen to those who bid you to rely on the courtiers and sycophants like Steve STUPID Richards of the ‘Independent’ then you will find that you are lacking in essential legitimacy to remain in office… This is not a threat, Gordon.. This is a warning that all truthful observers of your time so far in office at 'Number 10 Downing Street' will want you to pay attention to …Khoodeelaar!…continuing to show up the unconstitutionality of conduct by the UK Govt that is being used as a tool for Big Business to loot the UK public under the misleading covers of the London CrossRail hole project….

[To be continued]


CROSSRAIL hole-plotter “undone mayor” Ken Livingstone has been defended [!!!] by Darcus Howe. As he has been by the weekly Vice [Oops! ‘Voice’ ‘newspaper’]. _Darcus Howe is also confessing to treating with equal respectfulness the one-time ‘Labour Party Black Section’ –banner-flaunting self-seekers Keith Vaz and Diane Abbott [1983-87] [1987 was the ‘general election’ which let those two into the CORRUPTING House of Commons as ‘Labour Party ETHNIC MPs’ along with the late Bernie Grant and the unlamented Paul Boateng]._There is no evidence that ANY SINGLE ONE of the ethnicity-linked time servers in either the House of Commons or in the even more corruptly appointed and installed 'House of Lords' has justified any hype attaching to their ‘appointments’ – none of them has shown any consistent or memorable or mentionable parliamentary democratic or ethical integrity let alone independence of mind or thought in any field and in any debate or on any issue that really matters in the context of the so-called black or ethnic representation in the UK parliament_I say 'so-called'!_Why? I shall give the criteria and description and justification for saying that. Before I do that, questions must be asked. The first questions include these:__What does Darcus Howe know that those who have apparently questioned Ken LYINGSTILL Livingstone’s integrity don’t know? What does Darcus Howe have as demonstrable evidence of his ‘career’ that is made up of ‘giving up personal gains for the sake of the collective society’? Has Darcus Howe EVER published the facts of any such? OTHER than the hypes that he fomented at the expense of un-named black people who really made the main sacrifices at both the Notting Hill battles and at Lewisham?_Has Darcus Howe been given the platform on the NewSS [=’New Statesman and `Society’ – now reverted back to ‘New Statesman’] because of the 'integrity' of Howe's 'character' and 'actions' before he was able to qualify for the Lyinsgtill's ‘Freedom Pass’ that he [Howe] has been exhibiting in ‘substantiation’ of his overly pretentious presumption that his statement [carried, ironically in the NEW SS website and publication - the same one that has Martin Bright as its 'political editor'] of support for Ken Livingstone amounts to something so significant that no other member of the ‘black’ population in the UK can universally verifiably claim to lend to THEIR opinion or views on the matter?


[To be continued]

1035 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 23 January 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole Bill' [the 'Crossrail Bill’ as is in the UK ‘House of Lords’ now] CAMPAIGN - continuing to update the UK House of Lords [as the legislative ‘upper chamber’ of the UK parliament, now preparing to formally ‘consider’ the ‘CrossRail Bill’] on the record and the evidence showing the unconstitutionality of conduct by the main touts for Big Business CRASSRAIL scam..._We add to the already existent massive files on Ken Livingstone’s lying perpetrations for the CRASSrail hole scam. This analysis of Ken Livingstone’s irresponsible and careeristic fiction [below] one is taken from the website today [Wednesday 23 January 2008] of a money magazine that exposes Livingstone’s subsidiary lying project - Livingstone’s peddling of the London Olympics 2012 myths and hypes.

The magazine publishes the analysis from another source, named in the contents below, that exposes the immorality and the inaccuracy of Ken Livingstone's maths….. _His maths too are a myth… __" Ken's Olympic-sized miscalculation _23.01.2008 _Here is a little mathematical conundrum for you. What number, if compounded at 6% per year, becomes 800m… but if compounded at 16% per year becomes worth 1.8bn? And how many years would this take? And if multiplied by 20% per year, would this number be 3bn? ___These are some of the questions posed by recent revelations that, in order to pay for the Olympic Games, money will be ‘borrowed’ from the National Lottery Fund; to be repaid from land sales once the great sporting jamboree is over. Sorting through the tangled maze of last week’s statements on this matter it appears that the government needs to recoup £800m from land sales post 2012, in order, says Ken Livingstone ‘to repay all the debts that we have incurred.’ I wonder whether this includes interest on the borrowed money? Somehow I doubt it. ___This figure, described as ‘conservative’ – I’ll come to this in a moment! – assumes 6% annual appreciation of the value of the land. Ken, though, reckons that the sale of land is more likely to bring in £1.8bn. This is based on annual appreciation of 16% per year, a figure that should have every investor rushing to Stratford, but which is bizarrely described by Ken as ‘quite cautious’. _____We can derive from these calculations that the land is presently worth about £470m. But to confuse the matter still further the London Mayor's director of planning and regeneration, Neale Coleman told the Commons’ Culture, Media and Sports Committee that ‘using the average land price inflation of 19% over the last 20 years, the LDA could make £3billion.’ ___This cannot be the case. If the land is now worth £470m then 19% annual appreciation takes its value to £2.3bn. You would need 23% annual appreciation before you got £3bn. ___This little political spat raises all sorts of questions, of which whether or not Ken Livingstone and his henchmen can do maths is the least important. The two big questions are: what is conservative? And, is the past any guide to the future? ____A 'conservative' consumption? _The so-called conservative assumption that the value of land in the Stratford region of East London will grow at ‘only’ 6% per year is based on the fact that this apparently was the appreciation recorded in the worst year of the last twenty. _That may be true, but anybody who assumes that the value of anything will appreciate above the rate of inflation and above the level of long-term interest rates is, at the very least, not allowing for the possibility that something could go wrong. This has echoes of Northern Rock, whose chief executive Adam Applegarth said that its business strategy worked very well ‘until the credit crunch came along’. _The reason that we conservatively put a roof on top of our houses is because we cannot be sure that the sun will always shine. That is conservatism. Was the possibility of a recession between now and 2012 not considered? Or was the possibility that there might be a hiccough in the property bull market conveniently forgotten in the urgency of siphoning off the Lottery money? _Did it not strike anyone that 6% per annum is actually quite a high figure? And that Ken’s ‘quite cautious’ 18% is just fantastic? The justification is the apparent 20% or so annual rise in land values in the area over the last twenty years. But might this not have been because land values in Stratford have been bid up in anticipation of the Olympic effect? For sure, this has been the case. _Taking London as a whole, the price of a hectare of land has risen from £759,000 in 1983 to £5.5m now. That represents an annual rise of less than 9%. So Stratford has already far outpaced the capital. Is this because Stratford is a wonderfully attractive place to live? Or could it be because several sharp property speculators have seen the Olympics cruising into view and have been busy buying up land in anticipation? _I think you know the answer to that. So will land values in Stratford rise by 6% per year, allowing the Lottery Fund to get its money back? Perhaps – but it is by no means certain. Will land values continue to rise at 16%, or 19% or 23% per annum. Not a hope! This article is taken from Tom Bulford's free daily email Penny Sleuth " __
By©Muhammad Haque

1220 Hrs GMT London Monday 21 January 2008:_More than fifty persons in the East End of London have signed a new campaign declaration in a matter of four hours and reaffirmed their commitment against Crossrail hole. This is from one part of the Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area where Khoodeelaar! Has been mobilising opposition against the CrossRail assault. _The local residents responded to Khoodeelaar! Campaign information that the current procedural period to register opposition to the ‘CrossRail Bill’ in the UK House of Lords was due to end in a matter of days. _It is expected that more than 100 others will sign their commitment and back the Khoodeelaar! formal objections to the CrossRail Bill to be put to the House of Lords this week. _At a campaign meeting held in the Whitechapel area, new condemnation was made against the local Tower Hamlets Council for continuing to lie to the local community about the Council’s collusion for the CrossRail hole plot. _[To be continued] _[Texts from an earlier part of this Khoodeelaar! commentary by MUHAMMAD HAQUE and as published by Khoodeelaar! on the Internet today Monday 21 January 2008] _Khoodeelaar! The East London Campaign against the ‘Crossrail hole plot’ [the ‘Crossrail Bill’] updating the publication of the evidential context for the demand being reiterated this week to the UK Parliament [‘house of lords] to scrap the ‘Crossrail bill’ and to recommend that the transport needs of London and the relevant other parts of the country are addressed by the uk govt giving priority to what the transport needs of the ordinary public are, what the sustainable solution is… _Khoodeelaar! asks the UK House of Lords [the ‘upper chamber’ of parliament- which in practice is the ‘lower caber’…] to show that it is acing in its role on making UK legislation in a universally objectively describable constitutionally compatible manner and that it, the UK House of Lords is and active and rigorous, ethical, intelligent and up-to-date forum for the competent, truthful, honest and timely scrutiny of any legislative proposal. ……. _Khoodeelaar! Question as put to the House of Lords this morning [Monday 21 January 2008] is in the context of the statement made by [Alistair Darling who at the time was] the Secretary of state for Transport as he introduced the ‘Crossrail Bill’ into the UK [lower chamber of parliament] House of Commons in February 2005. As he did so, the Secretary of State said that he was satisfied that the Bill was ‘compatible with the Convention’. _That was not true then. _That is not true now. _Because the ‘petitioning programme’ that is currently on about the objections against the Crossrail Bill [that is now in the House of lords] is being seriously restricted, the Khoodeelaar campaign is demanding to know how the House of lords can justify the restrictions and also claim that they are ding s by acting within the constitutional obligations _The following is quoted from the UK House of Lords administrative office guidance notes about petitioning against the Crossrail Bill. _The answer stated in the quoted part is in contravention of the ECHR. _"CAN I OBJECT TO THE BILL AS A WHOLE? _No. _The Committee will only be able to consider aspects of the project proposed in the bill, which affect people in their private capacity, not fundamental principles involving broader issues (such as whether a cross-London rail link should be constructed). Those issues are discussed and decided by the House of Lords itself (during a debate on the bill on the floor of the House of Lords). _The Committee cannot make recommendations on matters of principle nor do they have the power to reject the bill. _There is no point, therefore, in making political comments, raising general objections to the bill or in raising broad issues of policy in your petition, you should concentrate instead on the specific ways in which the bill directly and specially affects you or those you represent."

[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque

0800 Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 January 2008
_
Khoodeelaar! No to ‘Crossrail hole’ plot, No to ‘CRASS rail lies’ like ‘high speed link needed to Heathrow to keep London at the top of the league of world class cities’ - lies that Ken Livingstone has been uttering…

1. KHOODEELAAR! campaigners from the Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 area set to ask NEW and UPDATED questions and put them to the [‘legislative’] UK House of Lords to demand that the promoter of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ [now in the ‘House of Lords’], the UK Transport Secretary Ruth Kelly [MP] produce immediately unambiguous evidence that there is economic justification, there is environmental justification for spending £Billions of public money for a project that is peddled by its peddlers at its ‘most justifiable’ to be one about RUSHING passengers to Heathrow airport and then depositing them into an airport of waiting, of waste, of congested contaminated desperation…._2. What is the point of Crossrail…… _3. And other questions…._4. Khoodeelaar! SAYING NO to the congestion of lies by CRASSRail hole-plot backer Ken Livingstone… _5. Those lies can no longer be ignored by the ‘mainstream’… _6. The lies that they told in the ‘London’ ‘evening standard’ for Crossrail… _7. On the one hand the ‘evening standard’ and the lying CRASSRail hole-plotters denounced the ‘long hours, even days’ of waiting chaos at Heathrow and on the other and in almost the same breath they lied and said that CROSSRAIL was ‘vital’ to LINK with Heathrow… _8. Now, where do they propose to take the public once they RUSH them at high speed to Heathrow? _9. What happens when Heathrow is congested? _10. What is the point of the pointless CRASSrail then? …. _[To be continued]
_. The CURRENT campaign news, information and commentary being created for Khoodeelaar! By the AADHIKAR Media Foundation and published on the Internet is focussed on the CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. What is Khoodeelaar! doing to bring about compliance with the UK’s European Treaty obligations in the conduct of making laws in the UK. Khoodeelaar! is at once embarked on a multi-faceted programme of defence of the ordinary public in London and by extension across the UK against the illegal, unconstitutional, illegitimate behaviour on the part of the UK executive. As this week’s ‘comments’ in the ‘mainstream’ media in the UK has been about the near-disaster [that was, according to a number of news reports, averted only by a worrying 20 seconds!!!] at the Heathrow airport which reportedly occurred when Gordon Brown was in the vicinity, the Khoodeelaar! campaign is going to put appropriate legal and constitutional law emphasis on the demand that it has already put to Gordon Brown’s administration to show the evidence of uncorrupted correlation between the various claims that the Government has been making for the Big Business CrossRail hole plot. Of specific importance is the claim that has been made with insane fanaticism, and echoed by a Ken Livingstone-compromised Gordon Brown in the weeks and months between 1 October 2007 and 1 December 2007, to the effect that one of the most vital ECONOMIC arguments and justifications for Crossrail was that it would link up Heathrow airport with the rest of the ‘City of London’. Now that even Frank Field, MP [Birkenhead, England] [on the BBC Radio 4 programme 'Any Question' as broadcast on Friday 18 and Saturday 19 January 2008] has called Heathrow airport obsolete and assorted other commentators have been able to speak out against any plans to create another terminal at Heathrow airport, questions that Khoodeelaar! has already put to Ruth Kelly [the Current 'Crossrail hole plot-promoting UK Secretary of State at the Department for Transport'] will be updated and reinforced. 2007
_. Khoodeelaar! will show the constitutional law way forward for solving the genuine transport needs of London
_. Khoodeelaar! dissecting the language of CrossRail lies by Crossrail promoters
_. Khoodeelaar! evidence of constitutional and democratic questions as put to the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council – the past four years
_. Khoodeelaar! questions to the several relevant UK MPs
_. Khoodeelaar! questions to the office concerned in the UK House of Lords dealing with the House of Lords ‘consideration’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’
_. Khoodeelaar! diagnosis of the unconstitutionality of the behaviour of Ruth Kelly, Tom Harris and their co-ministers and post-holders in the uk Department for Transport
_. Khoodeelaar! invokes the ‘lessons’ of 1988 and the follies of the PRE-Crossrail UK Department for Transport and their THEN idiocies which exposed the UK Government of the day [Maggie Thatcher] to Europe-wide ridicule [ as based on the UK's Government’s UNCONSTITUTIONAL, unethical and dishonest behaviour] in a big way
_. Khoodeelaar! constitutional law updates against the drafting of, the proceedings about and the promotion of the current ‘Crossrail Bill’
_. Khoodeelaar! campaign updates
_. Khoodeelaar! breaking news


_By Muhammad Haque_1410 Hrs GMT_London Thursday 17 January 2008_As I have been saying for the past almost eight years – since I came across a piece of paper issued by the CRASSrail hole plot-inviting clique in Tower Hamlets – the scheme would bring no benefits to the East End. It could not do so. What is more, the TRANSPORT needs of the UK as a whole or even those of ‘England and Wales’ [my phraseology is devolving here in ‘line’ with the ‘Scottish’ accent....] would not be addressed unless the entire schema was thoroughly revised by taking into truthful account all the factors involved. The KEY factor that I have been stressing ALL Along – and one which is the reason why I decided to label the ‘decision-making’ perpetrators as the ‘corrupt claque’ in control of the Tower Hamlets Council, is that of the deliberate policy of neglecting the ‘education’ of the children, the young people and the adults in the borough of Tower Hamlets… It is this particular one that today’s [Thursday 17 January 2008] Times newspaper group website acknowledges in their presentation of the ‘findings’. The Wigan web site is also vindicating, in effect, what I have said and what I shall continue to say on the evidence and on the facts against the ghastly inappropriateness of the WASTEFUL Crossrail scam.. That CRSSRAIL cist is bad for the rest of the economy just as it is for the overall transport needs of London people…[To be continued]
View HERE today's [Thursday 17 January 2008] anger against CRASSRail is being expressed in Wigan
_
By Muhammad Haque_1408 Hrs GMT_London Thursday 17 January 2008
View HERE today's reporting of the CRASSrail costs overruns as pub shed by the Times, London, newspaper group
_
By Muhammad Haque_1400 Hrs GMT_London Thursday 17 January 2008_CRASSrail hole plot-backer London FT confesses to having lied in the time before Gordon Brown ‘made the announcement about the public funding of the’ CRASS ‘rail’ scheme. View HERE the ‘news’ report as published by the London 'FT' [='Financial Times'] today, Thursday 17 January 2008, making confession to the lies and also vindicating – [without ever wanting to; to want to d so would show that they were ethically able to recognise the truth or to support the truthful campaign]- what the Khoodeelaar! analysis has always maintained: that the claim, as made by the pluggers of the CRASSRail project to the effect that it, CRASSrail, would bring ‘benefits’ to areas like the East London borough of Tower Hamlets was a multi-layered, poisonous, corrupting, criminally negligent untruth of indescribable social irresponsibility
[To be continued]
___CLICK HERE to view the LATEST Khoodeelaar! 'No to Crossrail hole Bill’ campaign news, INCLUDING the updated texts of the summary of the Khoodeelaar! CONSTITUTIONAL LAW objections being put to the UK House of Lords against the purpose, against the promotion, against the contents and against the procedures attached to the ‘Crossrail Bill’ in the UK Parliament [as has been evident in the behaviour of the holder of the post of Secretary of State – UK cabinet Minister - for Transport since February 2005] and as has been evident in the behaviour of the corrupt unconstitutional, unethical, prejudiced, spiteful, ignorant, time-serving bureaucracy that was in control of the pathetic, the parasitical, the undignified ‘CrossRail Bill; ‘select committee’ ‘of MPs [more later on that disgraceful episode at the behest of the Big Business-linked Tony Blaired UK Govt administration used by Big Business to promote Crossrail as the cover to loot the UK public ] comments and legal updates on the CURRENT Khoodeelaar! Campaign Action against the Crossrail hole plot. ……
Poverty of the Blairing assault by Gordon Brown on the inner city East End of London - New feature here soon

Poverty of the ‘Tower Hamlets schools performance propaganda’ - New feature here soon

Other web sites and web pages that regularly carry the AADHIKARonline contents include [as at 1045 Hrs GMT on Thursday 17 January [ 2008] __www.aadhikar.com_www.cbruk.com_www.khoodeelaar.com_and_khoodeelaar.wordpress.com

Today’s [Thursday 17 January 2008] editions of AADHIKARonline and the related web sites jointly publishing the arguments and the moral, the democratic, the social and the constitutional defence of the inner city East End of London against the CRASSrail hole project being pushed through the UK Houses of Parliament by a morally compromised Gordon Brown - will include the Muhammad Haque daily world ethicality commentary examining the rising tide of corrupt and lack of morality in the behaviour of the Gordon Brown ‘administration'’. _why Gordon brown must behave in transparently honest and accountable and constitutional manner and move to scrap the CRASSrail hole bill_why the liars for CrossRail – as being exposed in effect via the big business-linked ‘construction industry professionals’ [see the reports in the ft and the times newspapers, today, Thursday 17 January 2008] should be asked to resign al the publicly paid for posts and positions that they hold or are seeking to hold__How Peter Hain’s allegedly unique imbroglio is in fact and on the facts part and parcel of the corruption that is endemic in the Britain that Gordon Brown so ridiculously boasts about. _When Brown imperiously utters the imperialistic slogans and couches them all in his even more ridiculously irrelevant and inappropriate phrase pronounced in his ridiculously placed and contrived pr-racist accent as British vah-loos’ does he do that in the knowledge that right across the inner cities in the UK ‘mainland’ where most of the impoverished people ‘live’, there are cabals of Blair-praising, Gordon Brown-applauding careerists, little time servers and propagandists that are funded under various corrupting UK state schemes and that these cabals are there only to be used to keep the largest numbers of the deprived, the impoverished under control? And that he, Gurdon Brown ‘knows’ that these cabals are made up of exhibition-standard ethnicity-linked surrogates, ethnic surrogates who will be put on parade whenever the thrust of the new Discrimination, the newel inequality that Brown is plotting is felt by the majority of the targeted people in the inner cities? Does he, Gordon Brown, mean the likes that the beleaguered ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone has been wheeling out at regular publicity intervals recently? Does Brown also feel ‘assured’ that the likes of the state-sponsored agents of racism in Britain today, as personified and typified by Trevor the Terrible P-lips, will serve en as the couriers of corruption that Gordon Brown wants to infect the ordinary people across the inner cities with? _[To be continued]

Muhammad Haque questions BBC TV plug for Crossrail hole plot-backer Ken Livingstone, today

The dishonestly edited BBC ‘London’ news TV programme is set to give Ken Livingstone yet another promotion at the scheduled broadcast of a propaganda ‘interview’ at 1830 Hrs GMT today. _Khoodeelaar! Is telling the programme’s ‘political editor’ Tim Donovan to distance himself from the sleaze-ball Ken Livingstone-accommodating BBC agenda and actually use the available evidence of misconduct, misuse of office and powers and give Livingstone a serous interrogation. __Will Donovan do it? _Will Donovan be allowed by the corrupt BBC _executives to do it?

CROSSRAIL hole GHOSTS haunting Whitechapel in the early hours of Monday morning ! _CROSSRAIL hole-plotters’ ghastly self-promotion and photo opportunity near the GHOST Bus service heading for Whitechapel! – And how the ‘local’ ‘independent’ ‘newspaper’ the East London Idiotiser aids and abets the CRASSRail hole plot-backing trio of John Biggs, Denise Jones and Jim F.Patrick ! – Part 1
the east London Idiotiser’ behaves in typically idiotic fashion when it manages to spend time and resource in promoting the petty careeristic agenda of not one but as many as three CrossRail hole plot-backers against the east end of London. And the idiotic ‘newspaper’ fails to mention the CRASSRail plot in an over-lengthy piece that it then parades on its equally ignorantly-‘edited’ web site. The task of getting the spin by the CrossRail hole three is first undertaken by another web site and by the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against Crossrail hole plot..__with ‘journalism’ like that as displayed by the ‘East London Idiotiser’ there is no way that the community in the East End of London can get the vital information and reporting service we deserve if we are to be able to defend ourselves against the Big Business-dictated, US-multi-national-Bechtel-lobby-created agenda being carried out by the East London-derived ‘public offices’ being held disrespectfully by John Biggs, Denise Jones and Jim F Patrick

[To be continued]


On 10 January 2008, the London Times newspaper published another economics-related comment on the ‘CrossRail’ ‘scheme’. Although a promotional piece, it still contained enough evidence of the lack of merit in the present CrossRail 'scheme'. From an economic standpoint. The author of the times piece had previously written on CrossRail far more critically. That was in September 2007. On that occasion, Khoodeelaar! Had analysed the published position of the times newspaper and in the time since then, several items have been published on the times web site as stated by Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque. Most of those comments have been about – and against - the breaches by the CrossRail hole plot-backer [Blaired-Brown] government of the uk’s constitutional obligations /h2>

By©Muhammad Haque_1000 Hrs GMT London Monday 14 January 2008_A London community denounces ‘CrossRail station’ plans truly awful. Why are the plans being denounced as awful? Because of the lies that the CrossRail hole plot backer local council told in justifying its collusion with The Crossrail hole plot… but the lying council on this occasion - significant this - is not tower hamlets. Just like tower hamlets council though. That one is across the river in south London. Khoodeelaar! Will be publishing another updated exposition of the lies that local councils have been telling to and against the communities in the ‘councils’ ‘areas’ and affected by the CRASSRail hole plot activities…

Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole Bill - the constitutional law Ground-Part 10
_
Khoodeelaar! Interpretation of the UK ‘constitution’ By©Muhammad Haque_0820 Hrs GMT_London__Monday 14 January 2008 The assertion made to Parliament [the House of Commons] By the Secretary of State’ that the ‘CrossRail Bill’ was ‘compatible’ with the European Conventions, has been Untrue. _The Conventions have been violated by the Secretary of State at every Crucial point. __The Secretary of State as the ‘promoter’ of the CRASSRail Scam [the ‘Crossrail Bill’ in its various forms to date] in Parliament has also breached the UK’s Human Rights Act And the Freedom of Information Act AS PART OF and in The process of the breaches of the ECHR. _Among other UK statutory and common law obligations in The context of the ECHR. _The breaches have not been either warranted by or related To or precipitated by any evidentially rationally, legally, Constitutionally and truthfully and fairly and justly and Transparently and ethically conceivable ground that any UK Secretary of State can advance [or could have advanced in The period since the actual ‘CrossRail Bill’ was introduced Into the UK parliament] in justifying any actual or Notionally exercisable or available ‘right to the specific Derogation’ from the UK’s Treaty obligations._[To be continued]

Muhammad Haque daily constitutional law commentary – on the urgent need for the ‘House of Lords’, the UK Upper chamber in Parliament, to wake up and hood the Government to account. The 'House of Lords' could make a start by rigorously scrutinizing the ‘Crossrail Bill’ and its purpose and its implications…
_1630 Hrs GMT London _Sunday 13 January 2008:
The role of the ‘Upper chamber’ [the House of Lords] [in the Uk parliament] is often not even mentioned, let alone recognised. Yet it could be a significant alternative to the servility of the House of Commons. Now, isn’t that a prospect! If only we had members in the Upper Chamber actually prepared to speak out on issues that matter. If we had the House of Lords really holding the ‘executive' to account by way of subjecting the CrossRail Bill to the kind of rigorous examination that the Bill actually warrants but has been allowed to escape in the House of Commons
To be continued
Earlier on Sunday 13 January 2008:
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN Organiser Muhammad Haque published the latest challenge to ‘London mayor election’ [scheduled to be held on 1 May 2008] ‘candidate’ Brian Paddick to state how he, Brian Paddick, would do anything AGAINST Crossrail when his ‘party’ [The Liberal Democrats] were ALL for the CrossRail scheme
By©Muhammad Haque 1135 Hrs GMT London Sunday 13 January 2008 “Given that there is a belated awareness in some sections of the ‘mainstream’ media of the need to hold the holder of the post of ‘mayor of London’ to account and given that Mr Paddick himself evaluates his own position as being in many ways unique - relying as he does on the fact of his police career – and most importantly, given his public disagreement with the current commissioner of police on a number of issues all to do with points of principle, isn’t it incumbent on Mr Paddick to explain why he has contradicted so many of his ‘party’s’ ’spokespersons’ on Crossrail and how, in this context he thinks he can carry out any policies that counter the position of his ‘party’ in the conceptual eventuality of his getting elected ‘mayor of London’?” [To be continued]
<


Jus how widespread has been the LYING and the misconduct by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council? Has the Khoodeelaar! Campaign been ‘exaggerating’ in any way in whatever we have been saying [now for the past 4 years] about the role,. The behaviour of the controlling clique on the Crossrail hole-peddling Tower Hamlets Council? Khoodeelaar! Has established a unique library of original work encompassing ALL aspects of the Crossrail hole-inviter Tower Hamlets Council. So unique and politically significant that our work is now recognised internationally. Khoodeelaar! Has been recognised - that is known as a reliable source of informed commentary about the state of Gordon Brown’s 'Britain' - now as being one of the most widely known and constitutionally active campaigns in the UK.. We show new evidence constituting the ground on which Khoodeelaar! Is internationally recognised.... … We show that Owen Whalley, the employee who has been placed in the role of operating the controlling clique's Blairising [that word, ‘Blairising’ has been just devised and used here for the first time, in this edition of the AADHIKARonline, at 1103 Hrs GMT Sunday 13 January 2008 –] agenda of INVITING the Crossrail hole problems upon the East End of London community, has been left out to dry, as it were, by the controlling clique… Because 'unknown' = allegedly, as we do not have reason to believe what Mr Whalley says either] to Whalley, the others, his ‘political controllers’ on the corrupt Council, KNOW and have known for a long while, that they have been BLOCKING Khoodeelaar! Communications to the corrupt Council…. Just as the ‘lead’ ! Member for degeneration was left out to rot in a limbo – but Khoodeelaar! Has been typically generous and has not taken the bait to annihilate the career of that pathetically misplaced ‘lead member’. So has Owen Whalley…. [To be continued]


Constitutional law commentary and report By©Muhammad Haque
_. Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN, organised in defence of the community in the East End of London, continuing to publish today Friday 11 January 2008 the comprehensive list of updated grounds against the ‘Crossrail Bill’ [now in the UK Parliament's ‘upper chamber’ the ‘House of Lords’ at ‘Westminster’] , including the exposition where relevant of the unconstitutional behaviour and dishonesty by the agents, the post-holders and the touts operating in the name of the community and installed in the 'public' bodies and groups, ‘platforms and forums including the following
_. the ‘Greater London Authority’
_. the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets London Borough Council
_. the Parliamentary constituencies of Bethnal Green and Bow and Poplar and Lime house/Poplar and Canning Town [whichever description of that constituency is appropriate, relevant and valid - this is a reference to the Boundary Commission's activities]
_. the CLRL company
_. Transport For London [=tfl]
_. The Department for Transport [=DfT]
_. the House of Commons ‘CrossRail Bill’ ‘select committee’ and its bureaucracy
_. The House of Commons ‘Sergeant at Arms’
_. the House of Commons 'Speaker's Secretariat and office



London CrossRail hole-plot-backer minister tom Harris and his DfT boss Ruth Kelly are exposed as being untenable. As is the big business agent in the house of lords j valentine… in a comment published today [Thursday 10 January 2008] by a blogger from Manchester [more on the guardian’s role, later] CLICK HERE to view a pdf version of the blog

By©Muhammad Haque 2050 hrs GMT_London_Thursday_10 January 2008
How is it possible that Churning fake News [=’Channel Four News’] has been able to flaunt both the Crossrail hole plot-tout Ken Livingstone and the universally guilty Tony Blair among the ‘short listed’ for political awards? Time to scrap Jon ‘Slow’ Snow and his corrupting Churning Fake News programme
_Whenever channel four news boasts about itself, it flaunts the face of Jon ‘slow’ Snow, as if his image is somehow synonymous with ‘accuracy, immediacy, relevance, integrity, accountability, transparency, truthfulness, courage, investigation and ethics and morality…’! _Or may be they flaunt his face in idle ignorance of any of the above criteria, which I attach to what should be a news programme on a ‘channel that I helped to found’! The truth of the matter is that I had feared that the ‘much-needed fourth TV channel’ that we were arguing for in the 1970s, might turn out to be yet another corrupting TV outlet for the organised gangs of crooks that wear ties and brag about their having 'gone to' the same gangster schools called ‘public’ schools and so on… _It was inevitable that I had to start campaigning again - almost immediately after Channel Four began broadcasting at the beginning of the 1980s - against the criminals that the [fourth] channel began to employ In the 25 years or so since the corrupting channel came to being, things have not got better as far as the peoples’ right to have truthful TV station or programme is concerned. Channel 4 in fact became identified as the Porn Channel and as if to prove that the BBC was no better than the Brothelliser, Corrupting corporation, the discredited, lying outfit then hired Michael Grade, ‘the Pornographer in chief' [as the Daily Mail was able to label him] as the BBC’s 'salvaging chairman! _How the criminals have prevailed… _To a point that this evening [Thursday 10 January 2008], the ghastly ‘news’ programme featured ken the CrossRail hole plot-tout as one of the 'Channel 4 News programme's ‘short listed’ political awards nominees! Including none other than Tony Bliar himself shown as being a ‘nominee’ for the award covering an entire decade…. _And this on the very day when news broke of Blair’s having been employed by yet another war-mongering, pro-nukes outfit, paying Bliar a reported one million dollar per year for a few minutes’ presence on their board a month….. What c4 news should have concentrated on, instead of parading the Bliar as if he had done no harm to the world. Here was a man who took part in the causing of and in the justifying of the murders of uncounted numbers of innocent people in Asia ….. And Jon slow was parading Bliar as the first face on the so-called short listed 6…. _If Gordon brown had not unintentionally exposed ofcom [in the past few days] as the corrupt outfit that ofcom itself is [brown hired as his spin doctor OFCOM’s former boss], I would almost certainly have called for ofcom to investigate the churning fake news itself! _No wonder that when Jon slow began to ‘interview’ john Hutton, Gordon brown’s nuclear minister, there was hardly any substance to the stock phrases that slow included in his routine… [to be continued]

By©Muhammad Haque_0520 Hrs GMT_LondonThursday 10 January 2008
Big Business Crossrail hole plot is CrossRail. Now it is getting to be derided as if it is CURSED rail! _As if the ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone’s insidious scheme is a measure of serious flaws in the very thinking, the very manoeuvring of the once ‘prudent’ ‘economics’ man Gordon Brown_That is the view of one writer published this morning by the Daily Telegraph group in London. Ineptitude is what Gordon Brown is being accused of. And excess costs. Linked with CrossRail. The writer says there is a much better and more economic solution available ….as compared with the costs and the irrelevance of CrossRail!

To be continued

The MUHAMMAD HAQUE daily world ethical commentary _1200 Hrs GMT_London Tuesday 8 January 2008
_Coming later on today [8 January 2008] in the Muhammad Haque daily ethical commentary on Gordon Brown the examination of the following aspects of the uk premier who has already given the phrase ‘British vah-loos’ a precariously dubious identity…._How is it ‘British vah-loos’ to attack the people pushed into involuntary poverty and deprivation BY Brown’s own administration? How is it ‘British vah-loos’ to maintain discrimination and violate the ethical aspects of peoples’ rights while deriding the targeted people undergoing these assaults for not showing enough initiative? What initiatives does Gordon Brown in office at no 10 Downing Street, recognise as being consistent with his appreciation of ‘British vah-loos’? How is it that there are increasing numbers of ‘British’ people who are being pushed into rotting existence due to the failures of the state, the failures which Brown has been significantly reluctant to see in time ? Or see at all? How can Brown claim to know what any ‘vah-loos’ are when he is the prime minister who has been found with no acceptable explanation for the financial disasters that have come to light, not to speak of the robbery of peoples’ privacy contrary to their universal human rights? [to be continued]
How is it that so many items of evidence in Gordon Brown’s behaviour since he officially assumed the tenancy at No 10 Downing Street London SW1 in 2007 have been cited by the entire spectrum of ‘mainstream media commentators’ to support their derisive conclusive about Brown’s competence [etc] and not one of those items has been acknowledged as being remotely to do with Brown’s clouded collusion with the CRASSRail hole plotter Ken Livingstone? How long before these commentators agree with an echo the Khoodeelaar! Dissection of Gordon Brown’s seriously ill-advised and unjustifiable hype for the Big Business CRASSRail? And does Gordon Brown really understand the implications of What he is desperately letting himself in for? I mean, does Gordon Brown really have the democratic ability or the moral legitimacy to really take on people who care about and selflessly defend the environment?
_[To be continued]

_Muhammad Haque daily commentary_1350 Hrs GMT London Sunday 6 January 2008


’Difficult decisions! ‘Tough year 2008’! Gordon Brown again promoted Andrew Maar to the de facto post of a platform, which should have belonged in the Houses of parliament. And Brown should have been subjected to the overdue scrutiny on each and every single one of his assertions as he made those to the undeserved promotion of Andrew Maar and the BBC. That post would have existed if we had an accountable, assertive Parliament in the UK. Gordon Brown is abusing the position of Prime Minister just in the same way that Tony Blair did. And the abuse is going to get worse during this year. Appearing on the Andrew Marr Show, which is in fact the courier of the same baggage and garbage of propaganda that was stinkingly foisted on the viewing public/people with the over-oiled face of David Frost.. It is clear that if there has been any change after Frost vacated that slot which now flaunts Andrew Maar as the occupant] it has been for the worse. Gordon Brown has been able to make utterances on it that no self-resetting 'national' [meaning central UK] constituency in a 'world class' [!!! More on that crass slogan so fanatically promoted by Brown's 'new mate' the 'undone mayor' Ken Livingstone] should put up with from such a facile and banal occupier of No 10 Downing Street… His courtiers may not have told Gordon Brown this yet. But he is in danger of becoming ridiculously incredible unless he stops making these appearances.. I am going to do the scrutiny of four of his key utterances as made via the Andrew Marr embarrassment called the interview..

[To be continued]

By©Muhammad Haque_1148 Hrs GMT_London Friday 4 January 2008__On Tuesday 8 January 2008, Khoodeelaar! Will put to the ‘CrossRail Bill’ ‘select committee’ in the UK ‘House of Lords’ the summarised version of the key objections to the contents and the purpose of the Bill. We shall do so in the knowledge of the ‘guidelines’ already published by the bureaucracy of the House of Lords concerning the objections and the remits. We shall be doing s in accordance with the UK’s constitutional obligations to afford due and full contents and evidence of the objections to be presented to the UK Parliament against the CrossRail Bill. Throughout the period of the House of Lords committee’s ‘consideration’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ we shall be publishing every day appropriate additional updates, news reports and constitutional law commentaries here and on other related Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole Bill CAMPAIGN web sites, blogs and other internet and electronic platforms. _For the LATEST Khoodeelaar! 'No to Crossrail hole Bill’ campaign news, comments and legal updates on the Khoodeelaar! Action against the Crossrail hole plot, CLICK HERE.

Khoodeelaar! Is the campaign against the London Crossrail hole plot Bill [the draft piece of legislation – a hybrid Bill, called the ‘CrossRail Bill’ - that is now being moved through the UK houses of parliament at the behest of Big Business interests prevailing over Gordon Brown’s administration. The Big Business lobby is set to loot UK ordinary peoples' money - we distinguish between 'taxpayers' money and the peoples' money - more on this at a later edition]. Khoodeelaar! Is a Seelotee [< ‘Sylhetti’ < ‘Sylhet’] language word devised by Muhammad Haque in the East End of London, to signify the defence against and to denote the destructive agenda by big business that has been afoot under covers of plots like the Crossrail hole scam. Khoodeelaar! Is the campaign that has created a new and current foundation of argument based on the evidence that is universally independently objectively verifiable. The arguments are at once revenant to the east end of London as we as to the rest of the inner cities UK. By accessible extension, the arguments are as valid in the east end of London as they are in those parts of other ‘western’ cities where income and social disparity are the essential ingredients of the [classic] capitalist [and its variants that are manifest in the local forms, mechanisms and scams of ] exploitation regimes. Khoodeelaar! Is currently preparing a series of constitutional law representations against the contents and the purpose of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ …that constitutional law campaign by Khoodeelaar! Defending the community in the East End of London begins in the first week of January 2008. Visit this and associated web sites to stay in touch with that stage of the universal and the historic campaign for the upholding of the rights of the people of the east End of London – and by extension of the advocacy in principle of those of the rights of all the pressurized, violated, disenfranchised destitute peoples in the UK inner cities and of the other parts of the world- and for the voicing of the rights in principle of the vast majority whose voices are not heard in the UK parliament... If with no complete success in on and referring to at the next level and stage of our campaign which will be taken before getting the ‘select committee in the UK Parliament’s Upper Chamber [the ‘House of Lords’] to agree with our aims …._for the records_Records that we shall be relying e the European judicial and constitutional platforms